A Further Look at Model Evaluation

作者: Bernd Schips , Yngve Abrahamsen

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-06824-3_5

关键词:

摘要: In this chapter we compare the specification tests generally used in econometric model building with recently developed p-step Stone-Geisser prediction using jackknife procedures. The comparisons are based on a Monte Carlo study different structural forms. forms partly misspecified. Three sets of simulations presented: A variety single equation models, simple multi-equation macro model, and Klein’s Model I US data. statistics enable more critical evaluation out-of-sample performance estimated models.

参考文章(11)
Bernd Schips, Yngve Abrahamsen, Specification and Stability Tests versus Jackknifing: Some Illustrative Examples Statistical Analysis and Forecasting of Economic Structural Change. pp. 37- 43 ,(1989) , 10.1007/978-3-662-02571-0_3
Bradley Efron, Gail Gong, A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and Cross-Validation The American Statistician. ,vol. 37, pp. 36- 48 ,(1983) , 10.1080/00031305.1983.10483087
J. Ramsey, R. Gilbert, A Monte Carlo Study of Some Small Sample Properties of Tests for Specification Error Journal of the American Statistical Association. ,vol. 67, pp. 180- 186 ,(1972) , 10.1080/01621459.1972.10481223
RUPERT G. MILLER, The jackknife-a review Biometrika. ,vol. 61, pp. 1- 15 ,(1974) , 10.1093/BIOMET/61.1.1
Herman O. Wold, Econometrics as Pioneering in Nonexperimental Model Building Econometrica. ,vol. 37, pp. 369- 381 ,(1969) , 10.2307/1912787
Yock Y. Chong, David F. Hendry, Econometric Evaluation of Linear Macro-Economic Models The Review of Economic Studies. ,vol. 53, pp. 671- 690 ,(1986) , 10.2307/2297611
SEYMOUR GEISSER, A predictive approach to the random effect model Biometrika. ,vol. 61, pp. 101- 107 ,(1974) , 10.1093/BIOMET/61.1.101
Edward E. Leamer, Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics The American Economic Review. ,vol. 73, pp. 31- 43 ,(1983)
M. Stone, Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). ,vol. 36, pp. 111- 133 ,(1974) , 10.1111/J.2517-6161.1974.TB00994.X