Malocclusion indices: A comparative evaluation

作者: John M. Grewe , Donald V. Hagan

DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(72)90080-2

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The precision or chance error and the bias systematic of three malocclusion indices were measured using same sample 130 dental casts taken on 11- to 15-year-old children seeking treatment at University Iowa Orthodontic clinic. Three objective examiners scored casts, with double determinations, Handicapping Malocclusion Assessment Record (HMAR), Occlusal Index (OI), Treatment Priority (TPI). A high degree reproducibility within was indicated by Pearson product-moment coefficients found: r = 0.714 0.908. Analysis variance used further check time periods (within examiners) no significant variability. Using coefficients, a also found between when combined scores from each examiner's first second examinations for index compared: 0.761 0.890. difference examiners. Inspection revealed that greatest in mean 1.92. Four subjective ranked according their need treatment. Spearman rank correlation determined rankings versus average rank. OI had highest indices: OIrs 0.742, TPIrs 0.551, HMARrs 0.532. Of tested this study, one can be selected over other, regard intra- inter-examiner differences. would choice having least amount bias, as results study.

参考文章(9)
William B. Downs, Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis. American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 34, pp. 812- 840 ,(1948) , 10.1016/0002-9416(48)90015-3
Chester J. Summers, The occlusal index: A system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 59, pp. 552- 567 ,(1971) , 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90002-9
J.A. Salzmann, Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 54, pp. 749- 765 ,(1968) , 10.1016/0002-9416(68)90065-1
J.A. Salzmann, Malocclusion severity assessment American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 53, pp. 109- 119 ,(1967) , 10.1016/0002-9416(67)90226-6
R. M. Grainger, Orthodontic treatment priority index. Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research. pp. 1- 49 ,(1967)
Henderson R, Stricker G, Howitt Jw, Eastman Esthetic Index. The New York state dental journal. ,vol. 33, pp. 215- ,(1967)
E. H. Angle, Classification of malocclusion Dent. Cosmos.. ,vol. 41, pp. 350- 375 ,(1899)