Catalysts to withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery and reactions to discontinued screening: a qualitative study

作者: Kate J. Lifford , Alison Clements , Lindsay Fraser , Deborah Lancastle , Kate Brain

DOI: 10.1007/S10689-012-9567-X

关键词:

摘要: Women at high risk of familial ovarian cancer face a potentially difficult management choice between unproven screening (OCS) and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). It is not fully understood why women who initially opt for OCS may later undergo BSO, nor what the impact this be. This study explored catalysts surgery reactions to discontinuing OCS. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 21 had undergone having chosen explore their experiences, reasons feelings about surgery, The invasive nature frequency by themselves catalyst surgery. A number catalysts, including abnormal test results, secondary considerations, such as age-related factors, found prompt emotional following BSO varied relief, acceptance, loss reassurance. appears be an acceptable strategy under certain circumstances, but varying factors can decision instead BSO. complexity change should underestimated needs taken into account clinicians assisting making choices. These findings highlight importance timing decision-making that options need routine reconsideration, through clinical discussions, information support.

参考文章(26)
Krziminski Cde O, de Oliveira Dl, Guizzo Bs, [The software QSR Nvivo 2.0 in qualitative data analysis: a tool for health and human sciences researches]. Revista gaúcha de enfermagem. ,vol. 24, pp. 53- 60 ,(2003)
Sheri A. Babb, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Hope N. Heller, Alison J. Whelan, David G. Mutch, Thomas J. Herzog, Janet S. Rader, Qualitative Evaluation of Medical Information Processing Needs of 60 Women Choosing Ovarian Cancer Surveillance or Prophylactic Oophorectomy. Journal of Genetic Counseling. ,vol. 11, pp. 81- 96 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1014571420844
R Manchanda, M Burnell, A Abdelraheim, M Johnson, A Sharma, E Benjamin, C Brunell, E Saridogan, S Gessler, D Oram, L Side, AN Rosenthal, I Jacobs, U Menon, Factors influencing uptake and timing of risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at risk of familial ovarian cancer: a competing risk time to event analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 119, pp. 527- 536 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2011.03257.X
Matthew B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, The Qualitative Researcher's Companion ,(2002)
Alison Fry, Robert Rush, Camille Busby-Earle, Ann Cull, Deciding about prophylactic oophorectomy: what is important to women at increased risk of ovarian cancer? Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 33, pp. 578- 585 ,(2001) , 10.1006/PMED.2001.0924
Kate Brain, Clare Gravell, Elizabeth France, Alison Fiander, Jonathon Gray, An exploratory qualitative study of women's perceptions of risk management options for familial ovarian cancer: implications for informed decision making Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 92, pp. 905- 913 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2003.12.019
Karen E. Hurley, Suzanne M. Miller, Josephine W. Costalas, Doris Gillespie, Mary B. Daly, Anxiety/Uncertainty Reduction as a Motivation for Interest in Prophylactic Oophorectomy in Women with a Family History of Ovarian Cancer Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine. ,vol. 10, pp. 189- 199 ,(2001) , 10.1089/152460901300039566
Bettina Meiser, Phyllis Butow, Alexandra Barratt, Michael Friedlander, Michael Gattas, Judy Kirk, Graeme Suthers, Ian Walpole, Katherine Tucker, Attitudes toward Prophylactic Oophorectomy and Screening Utilization in Women at Increased Risk of Developing Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 75, pp. 122- 129 ,(1999) , 10.1006/GYNO.1999.5544