At the millennium: a slice of scholarship.

作者: Kay L Roberts , Beverley J Turnbull

DOI: 10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60428-X

关键词:

摘要: Scholarly output is the standard by which academics are judged; in particular journal articles. This study aimed to examine scholarly of nursing over a two-year period, and establish benchmark data for future longitudinal comparisons. Journal articles were used as unit analysis. The following characteristics examined: whether refereed or non-refereed; type journal; content characteristics; focus; predominant methodology research articles; focus specialty areas. principal authors their effect on also examined. demonstrated that while there had been no substantial increase output, was clear link between higher academic rank output. An increasing predominance demonstrated, with striking trend towards increased use qualitative methodology, number publications groups authors.

参考文章(7)
Genevieve Gray Young, Jocalyn Lawler, Rosalie Rebollo Pratt, Scholarship in the discipline of nursing Churchill Livingstone. ,(1995)
Kathryn L Roberts, A profile of nurse-academics in Australian universities Collegian. ,vol. 3, pp. 4- 9 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60171-7
Kay (Kathryn) L Roberts, Beverley J Turnbull, From apprentices to academics: are nurses catching up? Collegian. ,vol. 9, pp. 24- 30 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60041-4
Kathryn L. Roberts, A snapshot of Australian nursing scholarship 1993–1994 Collegian. ,vol. 3, pp. 4- 10 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S1322-7696(08)60136-5
Beverley J Turnbull, Kay Kathryn L Roberts, Scholarly productivity: are nurse academics catching up? Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. ,vol. 20, pp. 8- 14 ,(2002)
Kathryn L. Roberts, Nurse academics' scholarly productivity: framed by the system, facilitated by mentoring The Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation. ,vol. 14, pp. 5- 14 ,(1997)