A Match Made in Heaven: A Marginalized Methodology for Studying the Marginalized

作者: Steven R. Brown

DOI: 10.1007/S11135-005-8828-2

关键词:

摘要: Marginalization consists in not taking others into account on any number of valued outcomes, resulting powerlessness, ignorance, poverty, illness, insecurity, and other manifestations devaluation. Two illustrations are presented, including a brief summary Q methodology, an innovation factor theory that was marginalized by 20th century developments psychometrics but has more recently experienced revival interest, which is particularly suited to illuminating clarifying perspectives, those populations. The procedures associated with methodology demonstrated terms the goals Central American initiative foster development. A second illustration focuses applicability revealing tendencies within single individuals. variety recent current applications briefly summarized.

参考文章(58)
Debra L. Oswald, Richard D. Harvey, A Q-Methodological Study of Women's Subjective Perspectives on Mathematics Sex Roles. ,vol. 49, pp. 133- 142 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1024456829810
William Stephenson, Fifty Years of Exclusionary Psychometrics: I. Q Technique Operant Subjectivity. ,vol. 13, pp. 105- 120 ,(1990)
Dan Thomas, Larry Baas, Allen McBride, Contrary Convictions: Race and Subjectivity in Public Opinion on the O.J. Simpson Criminal Trial Operant Subjectivity. ,vol. 19, pp. 58- 84 ,(1996) , 10.15133/J.OS.1996.005
William Stephenson, Fifty Years of Exclusionary Psychometrics: II. Developments Operant Subjectivity. ,vol. 13, pp. 141- 162 ,(1990)
Good James, William Stephenson and the Quest for a Science of Subjectivy Revista de historia de la psicología. ,vol. 19, pp. 431- 439 ,(1998)
Dan Nimmo, None, Communication Yearbook 4. Transaction Books, Rutgers--The State University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 ($39.95 cloth).. ,(1980)
David Pelletier, Vivica Kraak, Christine McCullum, Ulla Uusitalo, Robert Rich, The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical study from New York's North Country Policy Sciences. ,vol. 32, pp. 103- 131 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1004641300366