Searching for Homo Economicus: Variation in Americans' Construals of and Attitudes toward Markets

作者: Paul DiMaggio , Amir Goldberg

DOI: 10.1017/S0003975617000558

关键词:

摘要: Economic sociologists agree that economic rationality is constructed and morality interests intersect. Yet we know little about how people organize beliefs or judge the of markets. We use Relational Class Analysis to identify three subsets respondents whose members construe markets in distinct ways. Subsamples display more structure than full sample associations among attitudes, between attitudes sociodemographic predictors. The economically advantaged favor market solutions each subset, but religious political identities, respectively, predict pro-market views uniquely subsamples through a lens. Results illustrate value distinguishing construals positions, examining population heterogeneity opinion data. Self-interest drives faith markets, only when ways consistent with their faiths.

参考文章(97)
Dane P. Rook, Relational Distance in Doxastic Finance: Local Risk, Revisited Social Science Research Network. ,(2014) , 10.2139/SSRN.2422276
Viviana Zelizer, Culture and consumption Princeton University Press. pp. 331- 354 ,(2010)
Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom Research Papers in Economics. ,(2002)
Luigi Guiso, Paola Sapienza, Luigi Zingales, Does culture affect economic outcomes Journal of Economic Perspectives. ,vol. 20, pp. 23- 48 ,(2006) , 10.1257/JEP.20.2.23
Raquel Fernández, Culture as Learning: The Evolution of Female Labor Force Participation over a Century The American Economic Review. ,vol. 103, pp. 472- 500 ,(2013) , 10.1257/AER.103.1.472
Zubin Jelveh, Bruce Kogut, Suresh Naidu, Political Language in Economics Social Science Research Network. ,(2015) , 10.2139/SSRN.2535453
Benjamin E. Hippen, Organ Sales and Moral Travails: Lessons from the Living Kidney Vendor Program in Iran Social Science Research Network. ,(2008)
Roger Friedland, Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. pp. 232- 263 ,(1991)