Application of LCA as a decision-making tool for waste management systems

作者: Cecilia Askham Nyland , Ingunn Saur Modahl , Hanne Lerche Raadal , Ole Jørgen Hanssen

DOI: 10.1007/BF02978506

关键词:

摘要: When materials are recycled they made available for use several future life cycles and can therefore replace virgin material more than just once. In order to analyse the optimal waste management system a given material, authors have analysed flows in cycle perspective. It is important distinguish this approach flow analysis from of products. A product analyses cradle grave, but uses some form allocation separate one another cases where component recycled. This paper does not address burdens between different systems, rather focuses on methodology decision making systems analysed. The focus here (raw extraction) grave (the or its inherent energy, no longer use). limitation number times be set by either recycling rate, technical properties material. article describes mathematical geometric progression that used expand boundaries allow times. Case studies polyethylene paperboard illustrate importance including these aspects when part Goal Scope LCA study identify which treatment options best results discussion examine conclusions reached about option most environmentally beneficial higher benefits taken into account. assess complete picture arising must expanded many manages take account If compares e.g. energy recovery with recycling, without expanding include effects reach conclusion preferred. purpose compare options, it loops physical reality. equations loops. error introduced significant. large enough change comparative study, such followed incineration much better directly. comparing solutions, feasible option, relevant ensure underestimated. presented should strategic decision-making management. LCAs due care, as could lead double counting (depending goal scope analysis). For closed loop cannot truly say materials, sophisticated will required, taking fact only certain proportion materials.

参考文章(12)
Giorgio Beccali, Maurizio Cellura, Marina Mistretta, Managing municipal solid waste International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 6, pp. 243- 249 ,(2001) , 10.1007/BF02979380
HA Haes, H de Bruijn, R van Duin, MAJ Huijbregts, Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards ,(2001)
Stuart Ross, David Evans, Excluding site-specific data from the LCA inventory: How this affects Life Cycle impact Assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 141- 150 ,(2002) , 10.1007/BF02994048
Karli L. James, Tim Grant, Kees Sonneveld, Stakeholder involvement in australian paper and packaging waste management LCA study International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 151- 157 ,(2002) , 10.1007/BF02994049
Bo Weidema, Avoiding Co-Product Allocation in Life-Cycle Assessment Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 4, pp. 11- 33 ,(2000) , 10.1162/108819800300106366
Tomas Ekvall, Göran Finnveden, Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 9, pp. 197- 208 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00052-4
Hans-Jürgen Klüppel, ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 3, pp. 301- 301 ,(1998) , 10.1007/BF02979337
Seungdo Kim, Bruce E. Dale, Allocation procedure in ethanol production system from corn grain i. system expansion International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 7, pp. 237- 243 ,(2002) , 10.1007/BF02978879
Adisa Azapagic, Roland Clift, None, Linear programming as a tool in life cycle assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 3, pp. 305- 316 ,(1998) , 10.1007/BF02979340