Modelling mechanisms with causal cycles

作者: Brendan Clarke , Bert Leuridan , Jon Williamson

DOI: 10.1007/S11229-013-0360-7

关键词:

摘要: Mechanistic philosophy of science views a large part scientific activity as engaged in modelling mechanisms. While textbooks tend to offer qualitative models mechanisms, there is increasing demand for from which one can draw quantitative predictions and explanations. Casini et al. (Theoria 26(1):5–33, 2011) put forward the Recursive Bayesian Networks (RBN) formalism well suited this end. The RBN an extension standard net formalism, that allows hierarchical nature Like it causal relationships using directed acyclic graphs. Given appeal acyclicity, cycles pose prima facie problem approach. This paper argues significant given ubiquity but be solved by combining two sorts solution strategy judicious way.

参考文章(65)
Clark Glymour, Robert Tillman, Peter Spirtes, Richard Scheines, Automated Search for Causal Relations: Theory and Practice ,(2010)
Phyllis Mckay Illari, Federica Russo, Jon Williamson, Lorenzo Casini, Models for Prediction, Explanation and Control ,(2011)
Carl F. Craver, Explaining the brain : mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience Oxford University Press. ,(2007)
Robert G. Cowell, V. Nair, David J. Spiegelhalter, Steffen L. Lauritzen, A. Philip David, M. Jordan, J. Lawless, Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems In: UNSPECIFIED Springer-Verlag (1999). ,(1999)
Clark N. Glymour, Peter Spirtes, Richard Scheines, Causation, prediction, and search ,(1993)
Z. Ghahramani, Learning dynamic bayesian networks Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 168- 197 ,(1998)
Peter Spirtes, Directed cyclic graphical representations of feedback models uncertainty in artificial intelligence. pp. 491- 498 ,(1995)