Rawls’s Point of View: A Systematic Reading of Justice as Fairness
作者： Marcos Fanton
DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821202000020003
关键词:
摘要: This paper offers a systematic reading of justice as fairness. By ‘systematic reading’ I mean an interpretation capable presenting the rawlsian political conception coherent theoretical framework with all its stages justification. argue that concept point view allows for this kind interpretation. In first part paper, briefly discuss difficulties obtaining comprehensive understanding fairness from some proposals previously set forth in literature. [...]
brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org参考文章(29)
G. A. Cohen, Rescuing Justice and Equality Raisons Politiques. pp. 103- 125 ,(2008) , 10.4159/9780674029651
Victor Gourevitch, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The social contract and other later political writings Cambridge University Press. ,(1997)
David Wiens, POLITICAL IDEALS AND THE FEASIBILITY FRONTIER Economics and Philosophy. ,vol. 31, pp. 447- 477 ,(2015) , 10.1017/S0266267115000164
Jürgen Habermas, , Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls's political liberalism The Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 92, pp. 109- 131 ,(1995) , 10.5840/JPHIL199592335
Carla Bagnoli, Starting Points: Kantian Constructivism Reassessed Ratio Juris. ,vol. 27, pp. 311- 329 ,(2014) , 10.1111/RAJU.12047
John Rawls, Samuel Richard Freeman, Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy ,(2007)
John Rawls, Barbara Herman, Lectures on the history of moral philosophy ,(2000)
Laura Valentini, Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map Philosophy Compass. ,vol. 7, pp. 654- 664 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1747-9991.2012.00500.X
Leif Wenar, The Unity of Rawls’s Work Journal of Moral Philosophy. ,vol. 1, pp. 265- 275 ,(2004) , 10.1177/174046810400100303