The Dialectical Tier Revisited

作者: Ralph H. Johnson

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_4

关键词:

摘要: Since I originally proposed that arguments require a dialectical tier, many commentators have weighed in with objections and challenges. Originally (1997/ 98;1999), then (1999/2000), (2000/2002), (2002/2002), (2001) — to mention just those who gone on record proposal.

参考文章(38)
Hans Vilhelm Hansen, An Exploration of Johnson's Sense of ‘Argument’ Argumentation. ,vol. 16, pp. 263- 276 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1019941018258
Christopher W. Tindale, A Concept Divided: Ralph Johnson's Definition of Argument Argumentation. ,vol. 16, pp. 299- 309 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1019997120075
Ralph H. Johnson, J. Anthony Blair, Informal Logic: The Past Five Years 1978-1983 ,(1985)
Ralph H. Johnson, Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts Argumentation. ,vol. 16, pp. 311- 331 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1019901304146
Leo Groarke, Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument Argumentation. ,vol. 16, pp. 277- 286 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1019993002329
Christopher W. Tindale, Acts of arguing : a rhetorical model of argument State University of New York Press. ,(1999)
Robert Paul Wolff, H. S. Thayer, Pragmatism : the classic writings New American Library. ,(1970)
Erwin P. Bettinghaus, Gerald R. Miller, Thomas R. Nilsen, Perspectives on argumentation Scott, Foresman. ,(1966)