Distributive Justice in Common-Bond and Common-Identity Groups

摘要: Two experiments tested whether common-bond groups (attachment based on interpersonal bonds between the members) and common-identity attraction to group as a whole; Prentice, Miller, & Lightdale, 1994) make different fairness judgments. Overall, use of equality heuristic (Messick, 1993) was expected. Moreover, social identity theory, we predicted that members show an egocentric bias, whereas forgo their individual goals for goal. In both experiments, positive negative outcomes were distributed. Experiment 1 manipulated degree involvement, 2 varied responsibility outcome. Results studies supported hypothesis, thus emphasizing importance distinction groups.