Effect of 2 flap designs on postoperative pain and swelling after impacted third molar surgery
作者： Dogan Dolanmaz , Alparslan Esen , Kubilay Isik , Celal Candirli
DOI: 10.1016/J.OOOO.2011.11.030
关键词:
摘要: Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 flap designs (envelope and modified triangular flap) for postoperative pain swelling after mandibular impacted third molar surgery. Study Design Thirty patients who had symmetric bilateral fully molars were selected. Left teeth approached with an envelope flap, right removed using a flap. Postoperative evaluated until the seventh day by verbal rating scales. Results Statistical analyses showed that there no significant differences between incision techniques regarding ( P > .05). Conclusions There is difference
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(8)
Paolo Capuzzi, Lucio Montebugnoli, Maria Antonietta Vaccaro, Extraction of impacted third molars. A longitudinal prospective study on factors that affect postoperative recovery Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. ,vol. 77, pp. 341- 343 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0030-4220(94)90194-5
Michael Miloro, G. E. Ghali, Peter Larsen, Peter D. Waite, Peterson's principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery. ,(2011)
D. Glenn Kirk, Peter N. Liston, Darryl C. Tong, Robert M. Love, Influence of two different flap designs on incidence of pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis in the week following third molar surgery. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. ,vol. 104, ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.TRIPLEO.2007.01.032
Maria Mercedes Suarez-Cunqueiro, Ralf Gutwald, Jan Reichman, Xose Luis Otero-Cepeda, Rainer Schmelzeisen, Marginal flap versus paramarginal flap in impacted third molar surgery: a prospective study. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. ,vol. 95, pp. 403- 408 ,(2003) , 10.1067/MOE.2003.84
Giuseppe Monaco, Giuseppe Daprile, Loredana Tavernese, Giuseppe Corinaldesi, Claudio Marchetti, Mandibular third molar removal in young patients: an evaluation of 2 different flap designs. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. ,vol. 67, pp. 15- 21 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JOMS.2007.05.032
R. Jeffrey Stephens, George R. App, Dennis W. Foreman, Periodontal evaluation of two mucoperiosteal flaps used in removing impacted mandibular third molars Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. ,vol. 41, pp. 719- 724 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90188-X
Norbert Jakse, Vedat Bankaoglu, Gernot Wimmer, Antranik Eskici, Christof Pertl, Primary wound healing after lower third molar surgery: Evaluation of 2 different flap designs Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. ,vol. 93, pp. 7- 12 ,(2002) , 10.1067/MOE.2002.119519
Donner A, Schofield Id, Kogon Sl, Long-term comparison of two surgical flap designs for third molar surgery on the health of the periodontal tissue of the second molar tooth. Journal of The Canadian Dental Association. ,vol. 54, pp. 689- ,(1988)