Jury instructions and mock-juror sensitivity to confession evidence in a simulated criminal case

作者: Christina M. O’Donnell , Martin A. Safer

DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1351965

关键词:

摘要: ABSTRACTWe investigated whether enhanced jury instructions, which added empirical findings about confession evidence to standard could sensitize mock jurors the in a criminal trial transcript. Participants (N = 314) read detailed transcript of simulated murder trial, followed by or instructions. The key was defendant’s recanted confession, gathered police using either coercive (weak case) appropriate (strong tactics. For example, testimony weak case, but not strong indicated that suspect likely intoxicated when interviewed, and lied against him hinted at leniency if he confessed. instruction groups rated likelihood defendant killed victim as significantly higher case than they were also more find guilty case. In co...

参考文章(35)
Nancy S. Marder, Bringing Jury Instructions Into the Twenty-First Century Notre Dame Law Review. ,vol. 81, pp. 449- ,(2006)
Brian H Bornstein, Joseph A. Hamm, Jury Instructions onWitness Identification ,(2012)
Saul M. Kassin, Karlyn McNall, Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior. ,vol. 15, pp. 233- 251 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF01061711
Maurice Rosenberg, William C. Mathes, Edward J. Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions Harvard Law Review. ,vol. 79, pp. 456- ,(1965) , 10.2307/1339195
Steven D. Penrod, Brian L. Cutler, Eyewitness Expert Testimony and Jury Decisionmaking Law and Contemporary Problems. ,vol. 52, pp. 43- 83 ,(1989) , 10.2307/1191907
Richard A. Leo, The Third Degree and the Origins of Psychological Interrogation in the United States Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment. ,vol. 20, pp. 37- 84 ,(2004) , 10.1007/978-0-387-38598-3_3
Nell B. Pawlenko, Martin A. Safer, Richard A. Wise, Brett Holfeld, A Teaching Aid for Improving Jurors' Assessments of Eyewitness Accuracy Applied Cognitive Psychology. ,vol. 27, pp. 190- 197 ,(2013) , 10.1002/ACP.2895
J. M. Salerno, S. S. Diamond, The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. ,vol. 17, pp. 174- 179 ,(2010) , 10.3758/PBR.17.2.174
Jeffrey N. Rouder, Paul L. Speckman, Dongchu Sun, Richard D. Morey, Geoffrey Iverson, Bayesian T Tests for Accepting and Rejecting the Null Hypothesis Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. ,vol. 16, pp. 225- 237 ,(2009) , 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225