作者: P.R. Shukla
DOI: 10.1016/0301-4215(95)00062-N
关键词:
摘要: Numerous GHG policy studies are reported for developing countries. Most use demand driven bottom-up models. Reported abatement costs vary significantly across countries identical options. This can cause conflicts such as GEF financing schemes. Top-down macroeconomic scant; their model structure assumes dynamics akin to developed market economies. Transitional of underdeveloped markets and informal activities inadequately modelled. Policy analysis is thus restricted oriented alternatives, while more relevant bifurcation scenarios along alternate development patterns ignored. Alterations in proposed represent the realities nations.