‘Plausible’ energy scenarios?! How users of scenarios assess uncertain futures

作者: Ricarda Schmidt-Scheele

DOI: 10.1016/J.ESR.2020.100571

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Explorative energy scenarios do not present the most probable developments but provide a set of plausible pathways in order to highlight uncertainty and complexity decision-making contexts. Although plausibility is widely assumed as effectiveness criterion for scenario work, little known about how perceived by users. This paper discusses conceptions from philosophy sciences, cognitive psychology, narrative theory linguistics identify key factors affecting scenarios. A conceptual model proposed that links users' perceptions storytelling internal structure scenario, credibility sources methods users’ worldviews styles. The outlines why are discarded or seriously considered wider audience was involved construction process. explains constitutes necessary sufficient condition usage provides practical implications producers.

参考文章(117)
Graham T. T. Molitor, Scenarios: Worth the Effort? Journal of Futures Studies. ,vol. 13, pp. 81- 91 ,(2009)
Harro Van Lente, Nik Brown, Brian Rappert, Andrew Webster, Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science ,(2000)
Douglas Walton, Rules for Plausible Reasoning Informal Logic. ,vol. 14, ,(1992) , 10.22329/IL.V14I1.2524
Robyn Warhol, Brian Richardson, Peter J. Rabinowitz, James Phelan, David Herman, Narrative Theory: Core Concepts and Critical Debates ,(2012)
Steven Shapin, Cordelia's Love: Credibility and the Social Studies of Science Perspectives on Science. ,(1995)
Emilio L. La Rovere, Hugh Pitcher, Joseph Alcamo, Hans-Holger Rogner, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Keywan Riahi, Sascha van Rooijen, Bert de Vries, William Pepper, Michael Schlesinger, Steven Smith, Tom Kram, Tsuneyuki Morita, Lynn Price, Alexei Sankovski, Gerald Davis, Robert Swart, Priyadarshi Shukla, Laurie Michaelis, Shunsuke Mori, Nadejda Victor, Joergen Fenhann, Amulf Griibler, Kermeth Gregory, Tae Y. Jung, Alexander Roehrl, Zhou Dadi, Stuart Gaffin, Special report on emissions scenarios (2000). pp. 612- ,(2000)