The prospects of deliberative global governance in the G20: legitimacy, accountability, and public contestation

作者: STEVEN SLAUGHTER

DOI: 10.1017/S0260210512000058

关键词:

摘要: This article contends that the ‘G’ system struggles to play a legitimate and effective role in global governance argues G20 could important if forum was more publically accountable. because of increasing forms public contestation, broadening agenda G8 uncertain status cooperation, legitimacy is being questioned. As such, it appropriate consider deliberative avenues whereby views be considered by systematic way foster accountability. consideration animated democracy theory republican which advance normative seeks transform structures enhancing deliberation reasoning political life. The outlines development system's legitimacy, considers possible modes accountability involvement with respect examines implications formalised G20.

参考文章(28)
Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, David Held, Taming globalization : frontiers of governance Polity. ,(2003)
Mark Beeson, Stephen Bell, The G-20 and International Economic Governance: Hegemony, Collectivism, or Both? Global Governance. ,vol. 15, pp. 67- 86 ,(2009) , 10.1163/19426720-01501005
Peter Laslett, James S. Fishkin, Debating Deliberative Democracy ,(2003)
Hugo Dobson, The Group of 7/8 ,(2006)
Casiano Hacker-cordón, Ian Shapiro, Democracy's Value Utopian Studies. ,vol. 11, ,(1999)
Philip Pettit, Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma, and Republican Theory Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp. 138- 162 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470690734.CH7
Timothy J. Sinclair, Robert W. Cox, Approaches to world order ,(1996)
Ethan Leib, Baogang He, The search for deliberative democracy in China Palgrave Macmillan. ,(2006) , 10.1057/9780312376154
Philip N. Pettit, Two-Dimensional Democracy, National and International Social Science Research Network. ,(2005) , 10.2139/SSRN.871732