Institutional shareholder activism and limited investor attention

作者: Pornanong Budsaratragoon , David Hillier , Suntharee Lhaopadchan

DOI: 10.1002/RBF.12

关键词:

摘要: We investigate whether limited investor attention is a factor in the effectiveness of institutional shareholder activism. Prior research has shown that an inability market participants to allocate sufficient intellectual effort investment decision can have impact on price and volume behavior. extend this applied setting by considering California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) focus list, whose aim improve performance corporate governance target firms. find share response being included list function stock, which turn subsequent managerial response. This suggests when scarce cognitive resource, proactive exploitation news signals be efficient activism strategy.

参考文章(36)
Thomas H. Noe, Investor Activism and Financial Market Structure Review of Financial Studies. ,vol. 15, pp. 289- 318 ,(2002) , 10.1093/RFS/15.1.289
Jos van Bommel, Theo Vermaelen, Post-IPO capital expenditures and market feedback Journal of Banking and Finance. ,vol. 27, pp. 275- 305 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00249-7
Philip C English, Thomas I Smythe, Chris R McNeil, The “CalPERS effect” revisited Journal of Corporate Finance. ,vol. 10, pp. 157- 174 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00020-8
Claire E Crutchley, Carl D Hudson, Marlin RH Jensen, Shareholder wealth effects of CalPERS' activism Financial Services Review. ,vol. 7, pp. 1- 10 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S1057-0810(99)80009-2
Mark Anson, Ted White, Ho Ho, THE SHAREHOLDER WEALTH EFFECTS OF CALPERS' FOCUS LIST Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. ,vol. 15, pp. 102- 111 ,(2003) , 10.1111/J.1745-6622.2003.TB00464.X
Woochan Kim, Woojin Kim, Kap-Sok Kwon, Value of outside blockholder activism: Evidence from the switchers Journal of Corporate Finance. ,vol. 15, pp. 505- 522 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2009.04.002
Paula Hill, David Hillier, Market Feedback, Investment Constraints, and Managerial Behavior European Financial Management. ,vol. 15, pp. 584- 605 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1468-036X.2007.00434.X
Stuart L. Gillan, Laura T. Starks, Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors Journal of Financial Economics. ,vol. 57, pp. 275- 305 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00058-1
James M. Nelson, The “CalPERS effect” revisited again Journal of Corporate Finance. ,vol. 12, pp. 187- 213 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2005.07.002