Glucanolytic Actinomycetes Antagonistic to Phytophthora fragariae var. rubi, the Causal Agent of Raspberry Root Rot.

作者: D Valois , K Fayad , T Barasubiye , M Garon , C Dery

DOI: 10.1128/AEM.62.5.1630-1635.1996

关键词:

摘要: A collection of about 200 actinomycete strains was screened for the ability to grow on fragmented Phytophthora mycelium and produce metabolites that inhibit growth. Thirteen were selected, all produced (beta)-1,3-, (beta)-1,4-, (beta)-1,6-glucanases. These enzymes could hydrolyze glucans from cell walls cause lysis cells. also degraded other glucan substrates, such as cellulose, laminarin, pustulan, yeast walls. Eleven significantly reduced root rot index when inoculated raspberry plantlets.

参考文章(37)
M-L. LAHDENPERÄ, E. SIMON, J. UOTI, Mycostop - A Novel Biofungicide Based on Streptomyces Bacteria Developments in agricultural and managed-forest ecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 258- 263 ,(1991) , 10.1016/B978-0-444-88728-3.50048-2
D. A Hopwood, Genetic manipulation of Streptomyces : a laboratory manual John Innes Foundation. ,(1985)
Don L Crawford, James M Lynch, John M Whipps, Margaret A Ousley, None, Isolation and Characterization of Actinomycete Antagonists of a Fungal Root Pathogen † Applied and Environmental Microbiology. ,vol. 59, pp. 3899- 3905 ,(1993) , 10.1128/AEM.59.11.3899-3905.1993
A. Tempel, M.A. Ruissen, G.J. Bollen, M. Gerlagh, A.B.R. Beemster, B. Schippers, Biotic interactions and soil-borne diseases. ,(1990)
L Chernin, Z Ismailov, S Haran, I Chet, Chitinolytic Enterobacter agglomerans Antagonistic to Fungal Plant Pathogens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. ,vol. 61, pp. 1720- 1726 ,(1995) , 10.1128/AEM.61.5.1720-1726.1995
D R Benson, W B Silvester, Biology of Frankia strains, actinomycete symbionts of actinorhizal plants. Microbiological Research. ,vol. 57, pp. 293- 319 ,(1993) , 10.1128/MR.57.2.293-319.1993
A.T. Bolton, Control of Pythium aphanidermatum in poinsettia in a soilless culture by Trichoderma viride and a Streptomyces sp. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology-revue Canadienne De Phytopathologie. ,vol. 2, pp. 93- 95 ,(1980) , 10.1080/07060668009501446