The sustainable water-energy nexus: Life-cycle impacts and feasibility of regional energy and water supply scenarios

作者: Alexander T. Dale

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Water and energy are critical, interdependent, regional resources, effective planning policies around which sources to use requires combining information on environmental impacts, cost, availability. Questions shifting water towards more renewable options, as well the potential role of natural gas from shale formations under intense discussion. Decisions these issues will be made in shadow climate change, both impact impacted by supplies. This work developed a model for calculating life-cycle impacts supply scenarios (REWSS). The was used discuss future pathways Pennsylvania, electricity Brazil, Arizona. To examine this also first process-based assessment (LCA) gas, focusing greenhouse (GHG) emissions, consumption, consumption. This LCA confirmed results that is similar conventional GHG though potentially has lower net due wide range production rates wells. Brazil’s electricity-related rise development continues. emissions shown double 2020 expanded (NG) coal usage, with 390% 2040 posssible tropical hydropower reservoirs. While uncertainty reservoir large, Brazil’s low intensity carbon targets threatened likely scenarios. Pennsylvania’s energy-related hinge whether NG replacement coal, allowing drop then plateau at 93% 2010 values; or transition fuel sources, showing steady decrease 86% 2035. Increased biofuels dominate land occupation may consumption depending irrigation – rises 7% 18% base case. Arizona further major basins, but aims reduce unsustainable groundwater usage. Desalination itself increase annual least 2% all categories 2035, prioritizing along desalination found GHGs 1% BAU, 2035 other 10% new construction operation. In PA AZ, changes have interconnected tradeoffs, making water-enegy nexus key part managing problems such change. Future supplies show higher interdependencies, not improve sustainability. offers way combine four important sets enable generation answers questions two resources.

参考文章(79)
Donald F. Boesch, Russell B. Brinsfield, Robert E. Magnien, Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication: Scientific Understanding, Ecosystem Restoration, and Challenges for Agriculture Journal of Environmental Quality. ,vol. 30, pp. 303- 320 ,(2001) , 10.2134/JEQ2001.302303X
Chris Hendrickson, Arpad Horvath, Satish Joshi, Lester Lave, Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 32, ,(1998) , 10.1021/ES983471I
Sarah James, Torbjörn Lahti, The natural step for communities : how cities and towns can change to sustainable practices New Society Publishers. ,(2004)
P L Spath, M K Mann, Life Cycle Assessment of a Natural Gas Combined-Cycle Power Generation System Other Information: PBD: 27 Dec 2000. ,(2000) , 10.2172/776930
Stephan Pfister, Dominik Saner, Annette Koehler, The environmental relevance of freshwater consumption in global power production International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 16, pp. 580- 591 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11367-011-0284-8
Fulvio Ardente, Marco Beccali, Maurizio Cellura, Valerio Lo Brano, Energy performances and life cycle assessment of an Italian wind farm Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 12, pp. 200- 217 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2006.05.013
M. Busch, W.E. Mickols, Reducing energy consumption in seawater desalination Desalination. ,vol. 165, pp. 299- 312 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.DESAL.2004.06.035
N. Vlasopoulos, F.A. Memon, D. Butler, R. Murphy, Life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment technologies treating petroleum process waters Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 367, pp. 58- 70 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2006.03.007