Interrelations and Dissimilarities Between Distinct Approaches to Ontic Vagueness

作者: Marc Andree Weber

DOI: 10.1007/S12133-013-0120-7

关键词:

摘要: This paper outlines the often striking parallels of various approaches to ontic vagueness, as well their even more differences. Though circling around same idea, some these were developed solve quite diverse theoretical problems and encounter different challenges. In addition difficulties, frequently disregarded epistemological all theories vagueness turn out be serious under critical scrutiny. The holds for difficulties deciding, every case whether involved is semantic or ontic.

参考文章(19)
E.T. Olson, An Argument for Animalism Blackwell. ,(2003)
Sebastiano Moruzzi, Richard Dietz, Cuts and clouds : vagueness, its nature, and its logic Oxford University Press. ,(2009)
Michael Morreau, What Vague Objects Are Like The Journal of Philosophy. ,vol. 99, pp. 333- 361 ,(2002) , 10.2307/3655512
Harold W. Noonan, Are there vague objects Analysis. ,vol. 64, pp. 131- 134 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1467-8284.2004.00473.X
G. Evans, Can there be vague objects Analysis. ,vol. 38, pp. 208- 208 ,(1978) , 10.1093/ANALYS/38.4.208
Lynne Rudder Baker, What Am I Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. ,vol. 59, pp. 151- 159 ,(1999) , 10.2307/2653462
Sydney Shoemaker, Persons, animals, and identity Synthese. ,vol. 162, pp. 313- 324 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11229-007-9253-Y