Memory interference and the benefits and costs of testing

作者: R Potts

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Testing often enhances memory, but memory can be harmed by interference from similar or competing items. This thesis examines two situations in which it has been proposed that testing harmful to because the test itself increases susceptibility interference. Experiments 1-8 investigate effect of generating errors during new learning. Participants learned definitions for unfamiliar English words, translations foreign vocabulary, either a response and being given corrective feedback, reading word its definition, selecting choice followed feedback. In final all feedback led significantly better correct definition than making incorrect choices, suggesting benefits generation are not restricted correctly generated Even when information is novel, errorful may play powerful role potentiating encoding Metacognitive judgments learning revealed participants were strikingly unaware this benefit, judging less effective method choosing, fact was better. Predictions reflected participants’ subjective experience A second series experiments (Experiments 9-10) claim reactivating consolidated destabilizes it, more susceptible English-Swahili pairs (List 1) on Day 1 with 3. When List reactivated form reminder immediately before Finnish words 2) 2, testing, far impairing enhanced revealing effect. Furthermore, 2 disrupted there no test, immunized against

参考文章(100)
Robert A Rescorla, None, A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement Classical conditioning II : Current research and theory. pp. 64- 99 ,(1972)
Thomas C. Toppino, Michael S. Cohen, The testing effect and the retention interval: questions and answers. Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 56, pp. 252- 257 ,(2009) , 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.252
Catherine O. Fritz, Peter E. Morris, Robert A. Bjork, Rochel Gelman, Thomas D. Wickens, When further learning fails: Stability and change following repeated presentation of text British Journal of Psychology. ,vol. 91, pp. 493- 511 ,(2000) , 10.1348/000712600161952
Lori A. McElroy, Norman J. Slamecka, Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. ,vol. 21, pp. 249- 259 ,(1982) , 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90593-X
Sean H. K. Kang, Harold Pashler, Nicholas J. Cepeda, Doug Rohrer, Shana K. Carpenter, Michael C. Mozer, Does Incorrect Guessing Impair Fact Learning Journal of Educational Psychology. ,vol. 103, pp. 48- 59 ,(2011) , 10.1037/A0021977
D.E. Berlyne, S.T. Carey, Sharon A. Lazare, J. Parlow, R. Tiberius, Effects of prior guessing on intentional and incidental paired-associate learning Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. ,vol. 7, pp. 750- 759 ,(1968) , 10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80137-9
Matthew Jensen Hays, Nate Kornell, Robert A. Bjork, When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. ,vol. 39, pp. 290- 296 ,(2013) , 10.1037/A0028468
Sherman W. Tyler, Paula T. Hertel, Marvin C. McCallum, Henry C. Ellis, Cognitive Effort and Memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory. ,vol. 5, pp. 607- 617 ,(1979) , 10.1037/0278-7393.5.6.607
Cecilia Forcato, María L.C. Rodríguez, María E. Pedreira, Héctor Maldonado, Reconsolidation in humans opens up declarative memory to the entrance of new information Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. ,vol. 93, pp. 77- 84 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.NLM.2009.08.006