On the complexity of trial and error

作者: Xiaohui Bei , Ning Chen , Shengyu Zhang

DOI: 10.1145/2488608.2488613

关键词:

摘要: Motivated by certain applications from physics, biochemistry, economics, and computer science in which the objects under investigation are unknown or not directly accessible because of various limitations, we propose a trial-and-error model to examine search problems inputs unknown. More specifically, consider constraint satisfaction ⋀i Ci, where constraints Ci hidden, goal is find solution satisfying all constraints. We can adaptively candidate (i.e., trial), there verification oracle that either confirms it valid solution, returns index i violated error), with exact content still hidden.We studied time trial complexities number natural CSPs, summarized as follows. On one hand, despite seemingly very little information provided oracle, efficient algorithms do exist for Nash, Core, Stable Matching, SAT problems, whose unknown-input versions shown be hard corresponding known-input up factor polynomial. The techniques employed vary considerably, including, e.g., order theory ellipsoid method strong separation oracle.On other substantially increased model. In particular, no time-efficient Graph Isomorphism Group (unless PH collapses P = NP). proofs use quite nonstandard reductions, an simulator carefully designed simulate desirable but computationally unaffordable oracle.Our investigates value input information, our results demonstrate lack introduce levels extra difficulty. accommodates wide range combinatorial algebraic structures, exhibits intimate connections (and hopefully also serve useful supplement to) existing learning complexity theories.

参考文章(41)
Indrayan A, Elements of medical research. Indian Journal of Medical Research. ,vol. 119, pp. 93- 100 ,(2004)
Uwe Schöning, Graph isomorphism is in the low hierarchy symposium on theoretical aspects of computer science. pp. 114- 124 ,(1987) , 10.1007/BFB0039599
Damien Ernst, Arthur Louette, Introduction to Reinforcement Learning MIT Press. ,(1998)
Umesh V. Vazirani, Michael J. Kearns, An Introduction to Computational Learning Theory ,(1994)
Sanjeev Arora, Boaz Barak, Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach Cambridge University Press. ,(2009) , 10.1017/CBO9780511804090
M. Grötschel, L. Lovász, A. Schrijver, Geometric Methods in Combinatorial Optimization Progress in Combinatorial Optimization (W.R. Pulleyblank, ed.). pp. 167- 183 ,(1984) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-566780-7.50016-7
Drew Fudenberg, David Knudsen Levine, The Theory of Learning in Games ,(1998)
R. Ostrovsky, D. Beaver, J. Feigenbaum, V. Shoup, Instance-Hiding Proof Systems ,(1999)
Constantinos Daskalakis, Paul W. Goldberg, Christos H. Papadimitriou, The Complexity of Computing a Nash Equilibrium SIAM Journal on Computing. ,vol. 39, pp. 195- 259 ,(2009) , 10.1137/070699652
Richard W. Cottle, George B. Dantzig, COMPLEMENTARY PIVOT THEORY OF MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING Linear Algebra and its Applications. ,vol. 1, pp. 103- 125 ,(1967) , 10.1016/0024-3795(68)90052-9