A complex network approach to environmental impact assessment

作者: Liven Fernando Martínez , Javier Toro , Carmelo J. León

DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2018.1552442

关键词:

摘要: ABSTRACTThis article proposes a complex network methodology for the process of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that limits subjectivity and reduces uncertainty by incorporating elements co...

参考文章(46)
R. R. Everitt, S. L. Tu, J. W. Evans, R. A. Carpenter, B. N. Lohani, H. Ludwig, Environmental impact assessment for developing countries in Asia. 1. Overview. 2. Selected case studies. Environmental impact assessment for developing countries in Asia. 1. Overview. 2. Selected case studies.. ,(1997)
Anne Marsden, Amy Shahtout, International Organization for Standardization American Society of Microbiology. pp. 447- 450 ,(2014) , 10.1128/9781555817282.CH22
Luna Bergere Leopold, Frank Eldridge Clarke, Bruce B. Hanshaw, James R. Balsley, A procedure for evaluating environmental impact Circular. ,(1971) , 10.3133/CIR645
Miguel A Munguía-Rosas, Salvador Montiel, María T Castillo, None, Redes, Ecología y Ciencias Sociales: las redes complejas en Ecología Humana Ecología Austral. ,vol. 23, pp. 135- 142 ,(2013) , 10.25260/EA.13.23.2.0.1178
Anastássios Perdicoúlis, John Glasson, Causal networks in EIA Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 26, pp. 553- 569 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.EIAR.2006.04.004
David P. Lawrence, Impact significance determination—Back to basics Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 27, pp. 755- 769 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.EIAR.2007.02.011
Javier Toro, Ignacio Requena, Oscar Duarte, Montserrat Zamorano, None, A qualitative method proposal to improve environmental impact assessment Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 43, pp. 9- 20 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.EIAR.2013.04.004
Albert-László Barabási, Network science: Luck or reason. Nature. ,vol. 489, pp. 507- 508 ,(2012) , 10.1038/NATURE11486
Katarina Pavlickova, Monika Vyskupova, A method proposal for cumulative environmental impact assessment based on the landscape vulnerability evaluation Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 50, pp. 74- 84 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.EIAR.2014.08.011