Satisfying the Procedural Prerequisites to the Compulsory Dispute Settlement Mechanisms of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention: Did the Southern Bluefin Tuna Tribunal Get It Right?

作者: DAVID A. COLSON , DR. PEGGY HOYLE

DOI: 10.1080/00908320390154600

关键词:

摘要: The compulsory dispute settlement regime included in the 1982 Law of Sea Convention is recognized as one most comprehensive a modern international convention. Yet, recent application this regime, question has arisen to whether procedural prerequisites associated with LOS Convention's mechanism are so arduous avoid binding and jurisdiction instances. This article addresses that by examining, particular, reasoning Southern Bluefin Tuna arbitration tribunal, which found Article 281 Section 1 bar prescribed Convention, offers suggestions how states might distinguish or overcome barriers imposed tribunal future cases.

参考文章(4)
Bernard H. Oxman, Complementary Agreements and Compulsory Jurisdiction American Journal of International Law. ,vol. 95, pp. 277- 312 ,(2001) , 10.2307/2661397
David A. Balton, Strengthening the law of the sea: The new agreement on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks Ocean Development and International Law. ,vol. 27, pp. 125- 151 ,(1996) , 10.1080/00908329609546078
Alan E. Boyle, Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction International and Comparative Law Quarterly. ,vol. 46, pp. 37- 54 ,(1997) , 10.1017/S0020589300060103
Thomas A. Mensah, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Leiden Journal of International Law. ,vol. 11, pp. 527- 546 ,(1998) , 10.1017/S0922156598000387