Can multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict upgrading of transrectal ultrasound biopsy results at more definitive histology

作者: Mohamed Abd-Alazeez , Hashim U. Ahmed , Manit Arya , Clare Allen , Nikolaos Dikaios

DOI: 10.1016/J.UROLONC.2014.01.008

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Objective To determine whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) has a role in reducing the uncertainty risk stratification by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy, using histology at transperineal template-guided prostate mapping (TPM) biopsy as reference test. Materials and methods Overall, 194 patients underwent TRUS who were followed up less than 18 months means of (a) mp-MRI with pelvic phased array T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (b) TPM biopsy. Of those patients, low on was defined 4 different ways—(a) definition 1: Gleason 3+3 (any cancer core length) (n = 137), 2: maximum length (MCCL) Results Median prostate-specific antigen level 7 ng/ml (range: 0.9–29), median time between 120 days 41–480), 60 1–420). A 48 cores 20–118) taken score upgraded 62 137 (45%) The negative predictive values 1 to 2 for predicting that remained (according each definition) 75%, 100%, 83%, 100% definitions 1, 2, 3, 4, respectively. An 5 had positive upgrade or upsize 59%, 67%, 69% Conclusion presence an lesion men low-risk confers, most high likelihood higher-risk disease will be present (either pattern significant burden). Conversely, if is not seen mp-MRI, attribution grade burden much more likely correct. Mp-MRI might therefore used triage resampling biopsies before entering active surveillance.

参考文章(26)
David Margel, Stanley A. Yap, Nathan Lawrentschuk, Laurence Klotz, Masoom Haider, Karen Hersey, Antonio Finelli, Alexandre Zlotta, John Trachtenberg, Neil Fleshner, Impact of Multiparametric Endorectal Coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Disease Reclassification Among Active Surveillance Candidates: A Prospective Cohort Study Journal of Urology. ,vol. 187, pp. 1247- 1252 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2011.11.112
Hebert Alberto Vargas, Oguz Akin, Asim Afaq, Debra Goldman, Junting Zheng, Chaya S. Moskowitz, Amita Shukla-Dave, James Eastham, Peter Scardino, Hedvig Hricak, Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting Prostate Biopsy Findings in Patients Considered for Active Surveillance of Clinically Low Risk Prostate Cancer Journal of Urology. ,vol. 188, pp. 1732- 1738 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2012.07.024
Flavie Bratan, Emilie Niaf, Christelle Melodelima, Anne Laure Chesnais, Rémi Souchon, Florence Mège-Lechevallier, Marc Colombel, Olivier Rouvière, Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study European Radiology. ,vol. 23, pp. 2019- 2029 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S00330-013-2795-0
A.P.S. Kirkham, P. Haslam, J.Y. Keanie, I. McCafferty, A.R. Padhani, S. Punwani, J. Richenberg, G. Rottenberg, A. Sohaib, P. Thompson, L.W. Turnbull, L. Kurban, A. Sahdev, R. Clements, B.M. Carey, C. Allen, Prostate MRI: Who, when, and how? Report from a UK consensus meeting Clinical Radiology. ,vol. 68, pp. 1016- 1023 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.CRAD.2013.03.030
Holly Sullivan, M. Scott Lucia, Priya N. Werahera, E. David Crawford, Shandra S. Wilson, Kathleen C. Torkko, Daisaku Hirano, J. Scott Stewart, Craig Brammell, R. Storey Wilson, Nozomu Kawata, Clinical staging of prostate cancer: a computer‐simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy BJUI. ,vol. 96, pp. 999- 1004 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2005.05801.X
Scott E. Eggener, Alex Mueller, Ryan K. Berglund, Raj Ayyathurai, Cindy Soloway, Mark S. Soloway, Robert Abouassaly, Eric A. Klein, Steven J. Jones, Chris Zappavigna, Larry Goldenberg, Peter T. Scardino, James A. Eastham, Bertrand Guillonneau, A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer Journal of Urology. ,vol. 181, pp. 1635- 1641 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2008.11.109
Nicola L. Robertson, Yipeng Hu, Hashim U. Ahmed, Alex Freeman, Dean Barratt, Mark Emberton, Prostate Cancer Risk Inflation as a Consequence of Image-targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: A Computer Simulation Study European Urology. ,vol. 65, pp. 628- 634 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2012.12.057
M Abd-Alazeez, A Kirkham, H U Ahmed, M Arya, E Anastasiadis, S C Charman, A Freeman, M Emberton, Performance of multiparametric MRI in men at risk of prostate cancer before the first biopsy: a paired validating cohort study using template prostate mapping biopsies as the reference standard. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. ,vol. 17, pp. 40- 46 ,(2014) , 10.1038/PCAN.2013.43
Adil Ouzzane, Philippe Puech, Laurent Lemaitre, Xavier Leroy, Pierre Nevoux, Nacim Betrouni, Georges-Pascal Haber, Arnauld Villers, Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading. Urology. ,vol. 78, pp. 1356- 1362 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2011.06.022
Nicolas B. Delongchamps, Gabriel P. Haas, Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects Nature Reviews Urology. ,vol. 6, pp. 645- 652 ,(2009) , 10.1038/NRUROL.2009.213