Consequential life cycle assessment of biogas, biofuel and biomass energy options within an arable crop rotation

作者: David Styles , James Gibbons , Arwel P. Williams , Jens Dauber , Heinz Stichnothe

DOI: 10.1111/GCBB.12246

关键词:

摘要: Feed in tariffs (FiTs) and renewable heat incentives (RHIs) are driving a rapid expansion anaerobic digestion (AD) coupled with combined power (CHP) plants the UK. Farm models were consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA) to assess net environmental balance of representative biogas, biofuel biomass scenarios on large arable farm, capturing crop rotation digestate nutrient cycling effects. All bioenergy options led avoided fossil resource depletion. Global warming potential (GWP) balances ranged from 1732 kg CO2 eM g 1 dry matter (DM) for pig slurry AD feedstock after accounting storage +2251 DM oilseed rape biodiesel attributing indirect land use change (iLUC) displaced food production. Maize monoculture GWP increases via iLUC, but optimized integration maize into an resulted negligible displacement iLUC. However, even under best-case assumptions such as full output AD-CHP, crop–biogas achieved low reductions per hectare compared Miscanthus heating pellets default estimates Ecosystem services (ES) highlighted soil water quality risks cultivation. eutrophication production was accounted for. The is sensitive design management factors application techniques, which not well regulated Currently, FiT payments dependent compliance sustainability criteria. We conclude that CLCA ES effects should be integrated criteria FiTs RHIs, direct public money towards resource-efficient energy achieve genuine climate protection without degrading soil, air or quality.

参考文章(50)
G. Thistlethwaite, D. C. Mobbs, A. Thomson, J. Jackson, R. Milne, E. Garnett, J. D. Watterson, L. M. Cardenas, C. Dore, N. Passant, L. Brown, M. Hobson, A. Wagner, Y. Li, T. Murrells, S. L. Baggott, M. K. Downes, A. Manning, J. Goodwin, Colin Walker, M. Adams, UK Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 1990 to 2005 ,(2006)
Jannick H. Schmidt, System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 350- 364 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11367-008-0016-X
A Balmford, B Vira, J Pretty, GM Mace, IJ Bateman, R Haines-Young, RK Turner, A Church, S Albon, J Winn, C Brown, Conceptual framework and methodology UNEP-WCMC. ,(2011)
Tatsuji Koizumi, Biofuels and food security Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 52, pp. 829- 841 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2015.06.041
Jesper Kløverpris, Henrik Wenzel, Per H. Nielsen, Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption - Part 1: Conceptual analysis and methodological proposal International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 13- 21 ,(2008) , 10.1065/LCA2007.10.364
Davide Tonini, Lorie Hamelin, Henrik Wenzel, Thomas Astrup, Bioenergy Production from Perennial Energy Crops: A Consequential LCA of 12 Bioenergy Scenarios including Land Use Changes Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 46, pp. 13521- 13530 ,(2012) , 10.1021/ES3024435
Yi Zhang, Anil Baral, Bhavik R. Bakshi, Accounting for Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part II: Toward an Ecologically Based LCA Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 44, pp. 2624- 2631 ,(2010) , 10.1021/ES900548A
Rosie Saad, Manuele Margni, Thomas Koellner, Bastian Wittstock, Louise Deschênes, Assessment of land use impacts on soil ecological functions: development of spatially differentiated characterization factors within a Canadian context International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 16, pp. 198- 211 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11367-011-0258-X
Arnold Tukker, Arjan de Koning, Richard Wood, Troy Hawkins, Stephan Lutter, Jose Acosta, Jose M. Rueda Cantuche, Maaike Bouwmeester, Jan Oosterhaven, Thomas Drosdowski, Jeroen Kuenen, EXIOPOL – DEVELOPMENT AND ILLUSTRATIVE ANALYSES OF A DETAILED GLOBAL MR EE SUT/IOT Economic Systems Research. ,vol. 25, pp. 50- 70 ,(2013) , 10.1080/09535314.2012.761952
Lorie Hamelin, Irina Naroznova, Henrik Wenzel, Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas Applied Energy. ,vol. 114, pp. 774- 782 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2013.09.033