Comparison of lighting simulation tools with focus on lighting quality
作者： Johanna Enger , Anahita Davoodi , Peter Johansson
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: By the rise of concerns for global warming, reducing emissions via lowering energy consumption has become a necessity in every sector and lighting is no exception. However, it should not come at cost quality user comfort which common practice today’s design reduction initiatives. The “energy reduction” view change toward “value driven optimization” balanced against optimization total value building. As use IT technology grows design, constant reviews software tools are necessary order to evaluate their performance ability lighting.The main objective this paper compare different simulation with respect simulate both artificial daylight. indicators comparison defined based upon findings from another project “criteria good quality” that currently being conducted same university. First, current numerical metrics summarized. Then, evaluated on literature study. outcome research summarizes strength shortcomings number tools.
参考文章(29)
Charlotte Bruun, Peter Johansson, Value Driven Briefing Process using ICT CIB 2013 World Congress. ,(2013)
Shariful H Shikder, Andrew Price, Monjur Mourshed, Evaluation of four artificial lighting simulation tools with virtual building reference summer computer simulation conference. pp. 430- 437 ,(2009) , 10.5555/2349508.2349566
Nina Ryd, Pierre Benning, Jan Tulke, Tim Brandt, Johann Jaeger, Marcus Schreyer, A Smart Decision Making Framework for Building Information Models the European Commission. ,(2009)
Jim X. Chen, Guide to Graphics Software Tools ,(2002)
Per Christensen, Frank Suykens, Henrik Wann Jensen, Toshi Kato, A practical guide to global illumination using photon mapping international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. ,vol. 38, pp. 60- 90 ,(2000)
J.L.M. Hensen, M.B.C. Aries, C.E. Ochoa Morales, Current perspectives on lighting simulation for building science conference; IBPSA-NVL 2010 Event; 2010-10-14; 2010-10-14. pp. 9- ,(2010)
Christoph F. Reinhart, Oliver Walkenhorst, Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds Energy and Buildings. ,vol. 33, pp. 683- 697 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5
Christoph F. Reinhart, Daniel A. Weissman, The daylit area – Correlating architectural student assessments with current and emerging daylight availability metrics Building and Environment. ,vol. 50, pp. 155- 164 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2011.10.024
Christoph Reinhart, Annegret Fitz, None, Findings from a survey on the current use of daylight simulations in building design Energy and Buildings. ,vol. 38, pp. 824- 835 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2006.03.012
Christoph F. Reinhart, Jan Wienold, The daylighting dashboard – A simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces Building and Environment. ,vol. 46, pp. 386- 396 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2010.08.001