The Effects Of Judicially Imposed Restriction Of Settlements To Compensatory Damages

作者: Lewis A. Kornhauser , Keith T. Takeda

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1793189

关键词:

摘要: Courts have traditionally limited judicially approved settlements to compensatory or single damages even in class actions based Federal civil antitrust law where trebling of is mandatory upon a finding liability. This paper analyzes the effects such settlement caps for both and multiple defendants shows caps: (1) reduce (2) introduce additional conflicts interest between plaintiff defendant defendants. The multi-defendant analysis done whose outcomes are perfectly correlated independent. In second part, provides an empirical Auction Houses case showing limitation actual practice demonstrate how model might be used by decision makers assess fairness

参考文章(5)
Lewis A. Kornhauser, Richard L. Revesz, Multidefendant Settlements under Joint and Several Liability: The Problem of Insolvency The Journal of Legal Studies. ,vol. 23, pp. 517- 542 ,(1994) , 10.1086/467933
Lewis A. Kornhauser, Richard L. Revesz, Multidefendant Settlements: The Impact of Joint and Several Liability The Journal of Legal Studies. ,vol. 23, pp. 41- 76 ,(1994) , 10.1086/467916
Christopher R. Leslie, De Facto Detrebling: The Rush to Settlement in Antitrust Class Action Litigation the Arizona Law Review. ,vol. 50, pp. 1009- ,(2008)
Orley Ashenfelter, Kathryn Graddy, Anatomy of the Rise and Fall of a Price-Fixing Conspiracy: Auctions at Sotheby's and Christie's Journal of Competition Law and Economics. ,vol. 1, pp. 3- 20 ,(2005) , 10.1093/JOCLEC/NHI003
Albert Choi, Allocating Settlement Authority under a Contingent‐Fee Arrangement The Journal of Legal Studies. ,vol. 32, pp. 585- 610 ,(2003) , 10.1086/377246