Multiple Effects Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Cost-Disutility Space

作者: Simon Eckermann , Nicola McCaffrey , Simon Eckermann

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50613-5_10

关键词:

摘要: Chapter 10 shows that the net benefit correspondence theorem methods, introduced and shown to have distinct advantages for multiple strategy comparisons in Chap. 8 provider efficiency comparison consistent with maximising 9, naturally extend such robust domain under uncertainty. In 4 we highlighted generalisable methods enable jointly considering costs effects uncertainty are required better inform funding decisions complex clinical areas as palliative care. While quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) integration of patient survival morbidity, they either unable, or struggle, incorporate domains carer impacts, family distress, finalising personal financial affairs being community choice place care death. Consequently, without cost-effectiveness analysis, use conventional single outcome evaluation (QALY measures otherwise) can misrepresent key preferences. Scarce resources funds easily end up supporting interventions, strategies programmes overall negative impacts not options maximise outcomes from limited resources. this chapter show how analysis cost-disutility (CDU) space enables joint consideration facilitating improved societal decision making. We outline illustrate (NBCT) on CDU plane also facilitate effect analogous summary measures. New identify across any set threshold values lowest expected loss (ENL) highest ENL planes potential value undertaking further research optimal contour well probability having (CEA planes).

参考文章(36)
David Christopher Currow, John D Cavenagh, Phillip D Good, David A Woods, Penelope H Tuffin, Peter J Ravenscroft, What are the essential medications in pallative care? - a survey of Australian palliative care doctors. Australian Family Physician. ,vol. 35, pp. 261- 264 ,(2006)
BA Weisbrod, Ackwwl Hansen, Economic Efficiency and the Distribution of Benefits from College Instruction The American Economic Review. ,vol. 60, pp. 364- 369 ,(1970)
Briggs, Gray, Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluation of healthcare interventions. Health Technology Assessment. ,vol. 3, pp. 1- 134 ,(1999) , 10.3310/HTA3020
Simon Eckermann, Andrew R. Willan, Expected value of information and decision making in HTA Health Economics. ,vol. 16, pp. 195- 209 ,(2007) , 10.1002/HEC.1161
A. Inui, Cancer Anorexia‐Cachexia Syndrome: Current Issues in Research and Management CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. ,vol. 52, pp. 72- 91 ,(2002) , 10.3322/CANJCLIN.52.2.72
Kenneth J. Arrow, Robert C. Lind, Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research. ,vol. 6, pp. 54- 75 ,(2014) , 10.1057/9780230523210_4
Karl Claxton, Andrew Briggs, Martin J Buxton, Anthony J Culyer, Christopher McCabe, Simon Walker, Mark J Sculpher, Value based pricing for NHS drugs: an opportunity not to be missed? BMJ. ,vol. 336, pp. 251- 254 ,(2008) , 10.1136/BMJ.39434.500185.25
Simon Eckermann, Jon Karnon, Andrew R. Willan, The value of value of information: best informing research design and prioritization using current methods. PharmacoEconomics. ,vol. 28, pp. 699- 709 ,(2010) , 10.2165/11537370-000000000-00000
Jose Maria Argiles, Olivan Mireia, Silvia Busquets, Fransisco J. Lopez-Soriano, Jose Maria Argiles, Optimal management of cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Cancer management and research. ,vol. 2, pp. 27- 38 ,(2010) , 10.2147/CMAR.S7101
Melissa Goebel, Anorexia–Cachexia Syndrome in Advanced Cancer Journal of Palliative Medicine. ,vol. 13, pp. 627- 628 ,(2010) , 10.1089/JPM.2010.9828