Misaggregation Explains Conservative Inference About Normally Distributed Populations

作者: Gloria E. Wheeler , Ward Edwards

DOI: 10.21236/ADA016829

关键词:

摘要: Abstract : Three major hypotheses have been proposed to account for conservative inference: misaggregation, misperception, and response bias. The research reported in this paper allowed the testing of these hypotheses. Subjects made probabilistic judgments about stimuli generated from normally distributed populations.

参考文章(17)
Benjamin Kleinmuntz, Raymond B. Cattell, Formal representation of human judgment Wiley. ,(1968)
Norman H. Anderson, James C. Shanteau, Information integration in risky decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 84, pp. 441- 451 ,(1970) , 10.1037/H0029300
Ward Edwards, Lawrence D. Phillips, William L. Hays, Barbara C. Goodman, Probabilistic Information Processing Systems: Design and Evaluation IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics. ,vol. 4, pp. 248- 265 ,(1968) , 10.1109/TSSC.1968.300119
Cameron R. Peterson, Wesley M. Ducharme, Ward Edwards, Sampling distributions and probability revisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 76, pp. 236- 243 ,(1968) , 10.1037/H0025427
Gloria Wheeler, Lee Roy Beach, Subjective sampling distributions and conservatism Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. ,vol. 3, pp. 36- 46 ,(1968) , 10.1016/0030-5073(68)90025-1
Robert L. Winkler, Allan H. Murphy, Experiments in the laboratory and the real world Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. ,vol. 10, pp. 252- 270 ,(1973) , 10.1016/0030-5073(73)90017-2
James Shanteau, Descriptive versus normative models of sequential inference judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 93, pp. 63- 68 ,(1972) , 10.1037/H0032509
James C. Shanteau, An additive model for sequential decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology. ,vol. 85, pp. 181- 191 ,(1970) , 10.1037/H0029552