The Quest for Scientific Rationality: Some Historical Considerations

作者: William R. Shea

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_7

关键词:

摘要: These are indeed exciting times for the philosophy of science. With decline logical empiricism practitioners have spread themselves over a wide range alternatives, resuscitating, in process, philosophies that positivists had condemned to netherworld obscurantism and irrationality. Hence objection new look is merely facelift or, more seriously, charge rationality has been abandoned pre-rational, a-rational or irrational modes thought. But while it may be true science can no longer described justified as body established knowledge, death-knell positivism need not toll such. Where one brand failed, another thrive.

参考文章(8)
Willard Van Orman Quine, Two Dogmas of Empiricism ,(1951)
Graham Priest, Alex Orenstein, Willard Van Orman Quine The Philosophical Quarterly. ,vol. 29, pp. 173- ,(1979) , 10.2307/2219492
Max Born, The Restless Universe ,(1935)
Lancelot Law Whyte, William Whewell's Theory of Scientific Method American Journal of Physics. ,vol. 37, pp. 1289- 1289 ,(1969) , 10.1119/1.1975325
Willard Van Orman Quine, From a Logical Point of View ,(1953)
E. J. Aiton, The vortex theory of planetary motions London. ,(1972)
Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery Studia Logica. ,vol. 9, ,(1959)