What is important in canine-assisted intervention teams? An investigation of canine-assisted intervention program online screening tools

作者: Elizabeth Kjellstrand Hartwig , John-Tyler Binfet

DOI: 10.1016/J.JVEB.2018.09.004

关键词:

摘要: Abstract The purpose of this study was to conduct an investigation online information and criteria for potential canine-assisted intervention (CAI) teams better understand current standards set by CAI programs. field animal-assisted interventions is burgeoning with programs having moved beyond canine visiting clients in a hospital setting providing support range variety settings. In response surge popularity programs, there need how both handlers canines are deemed suitable work. aim investigate published material volunteer their as means identifying commonly sought information, screening criteria, skills assessed across agencies. Over 320 were identified 64 randomly chosen be coded the analysis. A frequency distribution used identify most least frequently occurring presented Results indicated that common requested basic (e.g., human name, breed), required included team evaluation, age, vaccine status. Our outcomes also listed evaluation: accepting friendly stranger, down, sit, stay on cue, reaction neutral dog. We found requirements handlers, such handler skills, previous training, background checks, ongoing monitoring, lacking. Based these findings, authors recommend best practices program screening. findings from contribute emerging literature procedures hold implications research involving teams.

参考文章(26)
Molly K. Crossman, Alan E. Kazdin, Animal Visitation Programs in Colleges and Universities: An Efficient Model for Reducing Student Stress Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy (Fourth Edition)#R##N#Foundations and Guidelines for Animal-Assisted Interventions. pp. 333- 337 ,(2015) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-801292-5.00024-9
Aubrey H. Fine, Philip Tedeschi, Erica Elvove, Forward Thinking: The Evolving Field of Human–Animal Interactions Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy (Fourth Edition)#R##N#Foundations and Guidelines for Animal-Assisted Interventions. pp. 21- 35 ,(2015) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-801292-5.00003-1
Reesa Sorin, Tamara Brooks, Janice Lloyd, The Impact of the Classroom Canines Program on Children’s Reading, Social/Emotional Skills and Motivation to Attend School The International Journal of Literacies. ,vol. 21, pp. 23- 35 ,(2015) , 10.18848/2327-0136/CGP/V22I02/48840
Maureen Fredrickson-MacNamara, Kris Butler, Animal selection procedures in animal-assisted interaction programs Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy (Third edition)#R##N#Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. pp. 111- 134 ,(2010) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-381453-1.10007-8
Rachel M. Daltry, Kristin E. Mehr, Therapy Dogs on Campus: Recommendations for Counseling Center Outreach. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy. ,vol. 29, pp. 72- 78 ,(2015) , 10.1080/87568225.2015.976100
Lisa M. Tomkins, Peter C. Thomson, Paul D. McGreevy, Behavioral and physiological predictors of guide dog success Journal of Veterinary Behavior-clinical Applications and Research. ,vol. 6, pp. 178- 187 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JVEB.2010.12.002
Michela Verga, Manuela Michelazzi, Companion animal welfare and possible implications on the human-pet relationship Italian Journal of Animal Science. ,vol. 8, pp. 231- 240 ,(2009) , 10.4081/IJAS.2009.S1.231
James.A Serpell, Yuying Hsu, Development and validation of a novel method for evaluating behavior and temperament in guide dogs Applied Animal Behaviour Science. ,vol. 72, pp. 347- 364 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00210-0
Harold Herzog, The Impact of Pets on Human Health and Psychological Well-Being Fact, Fiction, or Hypothesis? Current Directions in Psychological Science. ,vol. 20, pp. 236- 239 ,(2011) , 10.1177/0963721411415220