Reporting and Interpreting of Results

作者: Lawrence M. Friedman , Curt D. Furberg , David L. DeMets

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1586-3_19

关键词:

摘要: The final phase in any experiment is to interpret and report the results. Finding answer a challenging question goal of research endeavor. Proper communication results clinicians also provides basis for advances medicine [1]. To communicate appropriately, investigators have review their critically avoid temptation overinterpret benefit or underreport harm. They are privileged position knowing quality limitations data better than anyone else. Therefore, they responsibility presenting clearly concisely, together with issues that might bear on interpretation. Investigators should devote adequate care, time attention this critical part conduct clinical trials. We believe policy “conservative” interpretation reporting best serves science, public health, medicine, interests readers.

参考文章(107)
D. A. Zarin, T. Tse, Medicine. Moving toward transparency of clinical trials. Science. ,vol. 319, pp. 1340- 1342 ,(2008) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1153632
R J Simes, Publication Bias: The Case for an International Registry of Clinical Trials Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 4, pp. 1529- 1541 ,(1986) , 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.10.1529
Harlan Krumholz, David Egilman, Joseph Ross, Kevin Hill, Guest Authorship and Ghostwriting in Publications Related to Rofecoxib ,(2008)
Mary Evans, Trials on Trial Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 119, pp. 109- 113 ,(1984) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1984.01390130091016
RICHARD SIMON, Confidence Intervals for Reporting Results of Clinical Trials Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 105, pp. 429- 435 ,(1986) , 10.7326/0003-4819-105-3-429
Curtis L. Meinert, In defense of the corporate author for multicenter trials Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 14, pp. 255- 260 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0197-2456(93)90223-Z
Joseph S. Ross, Gregory K. Mulvey, Elizabeth M. Hines, Steven E. Nissen, Harlan M. Krumholz, Trial Publication after Registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis PLoS Medicine. ,vol. 6, pp. e1000144- ,(2009) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1000144
Edward J. Mills, Ping Wu, Joel Gagnier, P.J. Devereaux, The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement Contemporary Clinical Trials. ,vol. 26, pp. 480- 487 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.CCT.2005.02.008
Julia K Elenbaas, Paul G Cuddy, Robert M Elenbaas, Evaluating the medical literature, Part III: Results and discussion Annals of Emergency Medicine. ,vol. 12, pp. 679- 686 ,(1983) , 10.1016/S0196-0644(83)80416-8