Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions

作者: Matt Golder , Jacek Stramski

DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-5907.2009.00420.X

关键词:

摘要: Although the literature examining relationship between ideological congruence and electoral rules is quite large, relatively little attention has been paid to how should be conceptualized. As we demonstrate, empirical results regarding can depend on exactly scholars conceptualize measure it. In addition clarifying various aspects of currently congruence, introduce a new conceptualization that captures long tradition in democratic theory emphasizing ideal having legislature accurately reflects preferences citizenry as whole. Our direct counterpart for vote-seat disproportionality measures so heavily used comparative studies representation. Using particularly appropriate data from the Comparative Study Electoral Systems, we find governments proportional democracies are not substantively more congruent than those majoritarian democracies. Proportional are, however, characterized by representative legislatures.

参考文章(56)
Ian Budge, Judith Bara, Andrea Volkens, Eric Tanenbaum, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998 ,(2001)
William Roberts Clark, Sona Nadenichek Golder, Matt Golder, Principles of Comparative Politics ,(2008)
Sven Berg, Seats and votes. The effects and determinants of electoral systems European Journal of Political Economy. ,vol. 6, pp. 148- 149 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0176-2680(90)90044-J
Gerald C. Wright, Robert S. Erikson, John P. McIver, Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States ,(1994)