A Case Study of Explanation-Based Control

作者: Gerald DeJong

DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-55860-377-6.50029-3

关键词:

摘要: An explanation-based control (EBC) strategy is shown to be in some respects superior the known human-constructed strategies from theory. The dynamical system controlled a complex one. Any solution necessarily drives far into non-linear region which chaotic regimes are typical. EBC demonstrates better time efficiency, energy and robustness unmodeled dynamics than existing theory solutions.

参考文章(14)
Benjamin Kuipers, Adam Farquhar, James Crawford, QPC: a compiler from physical models into qualitative differential equations national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 365- 372 ,(1990)
Erik Sandewall, Combining logic and differential equations for describing real-world systems principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 412- 420 ,(1989)
J. Scott Penberthy, Planning with continuous change University of Washington. ,(1993)
John C. Hogge, Compiling plan operators from domains expressed in qualitative process theory national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 229- 233 ,(1987)
Gerald F. DeJong, Learning to plan in continuous domains Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 65, pp. 71- 141 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0004-3702(94)90038-8
Kenneth D. Forbus, Qualitative process theory Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 24, pp. 178- 219 ,(1984) , 10.1016/0004-3702(84)90038-9
Brian Drabble, EXCALIBUR: a program for planning and reasoning with processes Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 62, pp. 1- 40 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0004-3702(93)90044-C
Thomas Dean, Greg Siegle, An approach to reasoning about continuous change for applications in planning national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 132- 137 ,(1990)
M.W. Spong, Swing up control of the Acrobot international conference on robotics and automation. pp. 2356- 2361 ,(1994) , 10.1109/ROBOT.1994.350934