The species concept as a cognitive tool for biological anthropology.

作者: EMILIANO BRUNER

DOI: 10.1002/AJP.22087

关键词:

摘要: Taxonomy is caught between the search for "perfect" theory and an elusive biological variability. The lack of major advances in issues related to how "species" other taxonomic categories are defined suggests that perhaps we should avoid excessively rigid formalism this regard. risk a separation elegant but useless theories confusing applications tools. Communication one main functions taxonomy, stability parameters taxonomy users be sensitive to. An excess may generate anachronistic consequences while continuous revisions make tool scarcely practical. current tendency pushes toward more fragmentation biologically valid taxa. While specialists enjoy such challenges, many feel bit nervous discouraged when trying use constantly changing. Debates over would seem particularly unrewarding fields with limited samples scarce diversity, as palaeoanthropology. In context, where information available rarely sufficient supply consistent taxonomical evidence, there frequently excessive efforts create debate on species separations. maintain purely theoretical level, or else distrust reliable taxonomy. A compromise (and recommended) choice these two extremes rely shared reasonable interpretations homogeneous evolutionary units, without diving into fine-grained will remain, however, unresolved. tool, not goal, biologist. Our mind needs discrete recognizable objects structure our perception reality. There no reason expect nature works same way.

参考文章(34)
Gene H. Albrecht, Joseph M. A. Miller, Geographic Variation in Primates Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution. pp. 123- 161 ,(1993) , 10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_6
J. Michael Plavcan, Catarrhine Dental Variability and Species Recognition in the Fossil Record Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution. pp. 239- 263 ,(1993) , 10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_10
COLIN GROVES, Species Concept in Primates American Journal of Primatology. ,vol. 74, pp. 687- 691 ,(2012) , 10.1002/AJP.22035
Folmer Bokma, Valentijn van den Brink, Tanja Stadler, Unexpectedly many extinct hominins. Evolution. ,vol. 66, pp. 2969- 2974 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1558-5646.2012.01660.X
Alfred L. ROSENBERGER, New world monkey nightmares: science, art, use, and abuse (?) in platyrrhine taxonomic nomenclature. American Journal of Primatology. ,vol. 74, pp. 692- 695 ,(2012) , 10.1002/AJP.22037
J. Michael Plavcan, Dana A. Cope, Metric variation and species recognition in the fossil record Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. ,vol. 10, pp. 204- 222 ,(2001) , 10.1002/EVAN.20001
Ian Tattersall, Species recognition in human paleontology Journal of Human Evolution. ,vol. 15, pp. 165- 175 ,(1986) , 10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80043-4
David Reich, Richard E. Green, Martin Kircher, Johannes Krause, Nick Patterson, Eric Y. Durand, Bence Viola, Adrian W. Briggs, Udo Stenzel, Philip L. F. Johnson, Tomislav Maricic, Jeffrey M. Good, Tomas Marques-Bonet, Can Alkan, Qiaomei Fu, Swapan Mallick, Heng Li, Matthias Meyer, Evan E. Eichler, Mark Stoneking, Michael Richards, Sahra Talamo, Michael V. Shunkov, Anatoli P. Derevianko, Jean-Jacques Hublin, Janet Kelso, Montgomery Slatkin, Svante Pääbo, Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia Nature. ,vol. 468, pp. 1053- 1060 ,(2010) , 10.1038/NATURE09710