The hundred most cited publications in orthopaedic hip research - a bibliometric analysis

作者: Sufian S. Ahmad , Christoph E. Albers , Lorenz Büchler , Sandro Kohl , Suhaib S. Ahmad

DOI: 10.5301/HIPINT.5000322

关键词:

摘要: BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to identify the 100 most cited classics in field hip research analysing their qualities and characteristics. METHODS Hip joint related articles were identified hundred selected for subsequent analysis citation count, current rate, density (citations/article age), authorship, geographic origin institution, level evidence (LOE). RESULTS In a total 121 journals, 1,311,851 published between 1945 2013, which 1,287 (0.1%) possessed 250 citations or more. Total per article most-cited ranged from 290 3,144 citations.The common areas degenerative disease arthroplasty, followed by preserving surgery leading authors William H. Harris Reinhold Ganz respectively. All 8 journals originated 9 countries. 10 institutes 48/100 articles. There significant negative correlation both age. count highest decade 1970. Although 5% (2,103 articles) literature comprised randomised trials (RCTs), only 1 (1%) an RCT. CONCLUSIONS The provides intellectual milestones research, reflecting on characteristics research. Degenerative arthroplasty take up greatest proportion citations, LOE low there one RCT amongst classics, emphasising that high is not prerequisite count.

参考文章(19)
Mohit Bhandari, Marc F. Swiontkowski, Thomas A. Einhorn, Paul Tornetta, Emil H. Schemitsch, Pamela Leece, Sheila Sprague, James G. Wright, Interobserver agreement in the application of levels of evidence to scientific papers in the American volume of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume. ,vol. 86, pp. 1717- 1720 ,(2004) , 10.2106/00004623-200408000-00016
E. GARFIELD, Citation Indexing for Studying Science Nature. ,vol. 227, pp. 669- 671 ,(1970) , 10.1038/227669A0
Kevin W. Boyack, Richard Klavans, Aaron A. Sorensen, John P.A. Ioannidis, A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996–2011 European Journal of Clinical Investigation. ,vol. 43, pp. 1339- 1365 ,(2013) , 10.1111/ECI.12171
Justin S. Brandt, Amy C. Downing, David L. Howard, Jason D. Kofinas, Stephen T. Chasen, Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 203, pp. 355- 360 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2010.07.025
John P. A. Ioannidis, Kevin W. Boyack, Henry Small, Aaron A. Sorensen, Richard Klavans, Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best? Nature. ,vol. 514, pp. 561- 562 ,(2014) , 10.1038/514561A
Dustin Edward Loomes, Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Bibliometrics of the top 100 clinical articles in digestive disease. Gastroenterology. ,vol. 144, pp. 673- 676 ,(2013) , 10.1053/J.GASTRO.2013.02.013
Michael R Murray, Tianyi Wang, Gregory D Schroeder, Wellington K Hsu, None, The 100 most cited spine articles European Spine Journal. ,vol. 21, pp. 2059- 2069 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00586-012-2303-2
Surena Namdari, Keith Baldwin, Kevin Kovatch, G. Russell Huffman, David Glaser, Fifty most cited articles in orthopedic shoulder surgery Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. ,vol. 21, pp. 1796- 1802 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JSE.2011.11.040
E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. ,vol. 178, pp. 471- 479 ,(1972) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.178.4060.471