Technology Education: AKA Industrial Arts

作者: Patrick N. Foster

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Pullias (1989) identified three viewpoints individuals may take regarding the implementation of technology education. One, which will be referred to as “revolutionary” position here, proposes “to discard old and begin fresh.” (p. 3-4). Another, perhaps “evolutionary,” view prefers keep part old, install new, ‘ease’ into full implementation” 3). The third “is disguise what we have been doing for years try make it look like a new curriculum” These can correlated directly positions one relative historical relationship between industrial arts For example, those who hold revolutionary find few similarities Pullias, argued that “blinders are going removed educators accept fact education is something totally new. Technology not remake arts...” (1992, p. 4). Those holding evolutionary point also see But they progenitor Dugger (1985) suggested major event cause when he noted “industrial has undergone tremendous curriculum thrust become education” 2). Echoing Dugger, Waetjen wrote:

参考文章(23)
R. Thomas Wright, Building a Defensible Curriculum Base Council on Technology Teacher Education and the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. ,(1992)
Donald Maley, The Maryland Plan. School Shop. ,(1973)
William McPherson, Joseph Luetkemeyer, The Ideas, Philosophy, and Contributions of Frederick Gordon Bonser. Man/Society/Technology. ,(1975)
C. Robert Hutchcroft, Problems and issues in industrial arts teacher education American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education. ,(1956)
Joseph Schimmel Taylor, A handbook of vocational education ,(1914)
John R. Wright, Ronald E. Jones, Implementing technology education Glencoe Pub. Co.. ,(1986)
Lee H. Smalley, Future alternatives for industrial arts American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education. ,(1976)
William H. Johnson, Louis V. Newkirk, The industrial arts program ,(1948)