Is 'green' religion the solution to the ecological crisis? A case study of mainstream religion in Australia.

作者: Steven Murray Douglas

DOI: 10.25911/5D7A2C8B9EB22

关键词:

摘要: A significant and growing number of authors commentators have proposed that ecologically enlightened (‘greened’) religion is the solution or at least a major part to global ecological crisis. These include Birch, 1965 p90; Brindle, 2000; Callicott, 1994; Gardner, 2002, 2003, 2006; Gore Jr., 1992; Gottlieb, 2006, 2007; Hallman, Hamilton, 2006b, a, 2007b; Hessel & Ruether, 2000b; Hitchcock, 1999; King, 2002; Lerner, 2006a; McDonagh, 1987; McFague, 2001; McKenzie, 2005; Nasr, 1996; Oelschlaeger, Palmer, Randers, 1972; Tucker Grim, White 1967. Proponents offer variety reasons for this view, including majority world’s many nations’ people identify themselves as religious, there large amount land infrastructure controlled by religious organisations worldwide. However, most important reason ‘religion’ said one more exceptional qualities can drive sustain dramatic personal societal change. The underlying sometimes overt suggestion crisis ultimately moral crisis, best placed address problem its root. above views are often though who not. Many proponents from USA write in context powerful role country. Others context. Very few about Australian where society variously argued be virtually non-existent, soon profound but covert. This thesis tests proposition It does using case study mainstream Australia, represented Catholic, Anglican, Uniting Churches. Churches’ policies practices analysed determine extent which these denominations fulfilling, might able fulfil, proposition. primary research method an Internet-based search policy praxis material. methodology Critical Human Ecology. finds that: ‘greening’ evident; it recent phenomenon older Churches; wealth environmentalist sentiment being produced; little institutional has occurred. Despite oftenstrong rhetoric, no evidence suggest concerns, even linked broader social concerns (termed ‘ecojustice’) ‘core business’ Churches institutions. Conventional anthropocentric welfare remain dominant.

参考文章(133)
Chris Park, Caring for Creation ,(1992)
Arne Naess, Self-realization. An ecological approach to being in the world G. Sessions (Ed.), Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century, Boston and London (Shambhala) 1995, pp. 225-239.. ,(1995)
L. C. Birch, Nature and God ,(1965)
Carolyn Merchant, None, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution Technology and Culture. ,vol. 23, pp. 653- ,(1982) , 10.2307/3104822
Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality ,(1978)
Emily D. Pelton, Al Gore, Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit Foreign Affairs. ,vol. 71, pp. 197- ,(1992) , 10.2307/20045160
Kathryn Ma, What I Know Now The Antioch Review. ,vol. 61, pp. 68- ,(2003) , 10.2307/4614432
Victoria Finlay, Martin Palmer, Faith in Conservation: New Approaches to Religions and the Environment Research Papers in Economics. ,(2003)
P. Bilimoria, J. Bapat, Australia's religious communities: a multimedia exploration Christian Research Association. ,(2000)