摘要: “Should some political ecology be useful?” Within many environmental fields the answer to Blaikie’s (2012) question is painfully obvious; for Political Ecology, it’s just painful. As Blaikie noted many, perhaps even most, Ecologists seem profoundly ambivalent about helping craft natural resource logics, policies, and plans we critique. We may understand what wrong with those documents ideas, but that does not often crystallize into determined engagement in reworking them.
acme-journal.org
researchgate.net 参考文章(37)
Luisa Montecucco, Evandro Agazzi, M. Buzzoni, Complexity and Emergence ,(2005)
David Tyfield, Neoliberalism, intellectual property and the global knowledge economy. Zed. ,(2010)
Nathan F. Sayre, Ranching, Endangered Species, and Urbanization in the Southwest: Species of Capital ,(2016)
Stephen Diamond, Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science ,(2011)
Kirstie Fryirs, Gary J. Brierley, Naturalness and Place in River Rehabilitation Ecology and Society. ,vol. 14, pp. 1- 10 ,(2009) , 10.5751/ES-02789-140120
Joyce E Canaan, Wesley Shumar, None, Structure and agency in the neoliberal university Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 172- 192 ,(2008) , 10.4324/9780203927687
Becky Mansfield, Darla K. Munroe, Kendra McSweeney, Does Economic Growth Cause Environmental Recovery? Geographical Explanations of Forest Regrowth Geography Compass. ,vol. 4, pp. 416- 427 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1749-8198.2010.00320.X
Piers M. Blaikie, The political economy of soil erosion in developing countries ,(1985)
Chris S. Duvall, Biocomplexity from the Ground Up: Vegetation Patterns in a West African Savanna Landscape Annals of The Association of American Geographers. ,vol. 101, pp. 497- 522 ,(2011) , 10.1080/00045608.2011.560061