A logical analysis of burdens of proof
作者： Henry Prakken , Giovanni Sartor
关键词:
摘要: … , can be verified by applying an argumentation logic to the evidence available at the final … generalised to statistical and story-based approaches. Keywords: logic, evidence, burdens …
philpapers.org
sci-hub.st 参考文章(22)
Juan Bayón Carlos, Why Is Legal Reasoning Defeasible Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 327- 346 ,(2001) , 10.1007/978-94-017-2702-0_17
Henry Prakken, Sanjay Modgil, Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs computational models of argument. pp. 252- 263 ,(2008)
James Harmon Chadbourn, Arthur Best, John Henry Wigmore, John T. McNaughton, Peter Tillers, Evidence in Trials at Common Law ,(2011)
Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor, The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, Essays in Honour of Robert A. Kowalski, Part II. pp. 342- 381 ,(2002) , 10.1007/3-540-45632-5_14
Nicholas Rescher, Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge ,(1977)
Byrne, David, Qc, Cross, Rupert, Sir, John Dyson Heydon, Cross on Evidence ,(1985)
Adrian Keane, Paul McKeown, The modern law of evidence ,(1985)
Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk, Logics for Defeasible Argumentation Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 219- 318 ,(2001) , 10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3
Henry Prakken, Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure? deontic logic in computer science. ,vol. 48, pp. 253- 271 ,(2001)
Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed, Douglas Walton, Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations Artificial Intelligence and Law. ,vol. 11, pp. 125- 165 ,(2003) , 10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9A