Multi-objective optimal operation of urban water supply systems

作者: Prashanthi Nirmala Kodikara

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: The world’s water resources are rapidly deteriorating due to the combined effects of global warming, climate change, population growth and fast development, posing new challenges managers. Conflicting objectives expectations various stakeholders have led increasing interests in consideration resolution multiple social, economic, environmental supply sustainability management systems, especially during extended dry periods. This study attempted develop assess potential a generic decision support framework assist evaluating alternative operating rules for multi-purpose, multireservoir urban systems. multi-objective outranking approach which facilitated incorporation stakeholder preferences making process is main focus area this research. elements illustrated on case Melbourne system, demonstrating its capabilities under single or group decision-making situations. Eight performance measures (PMs) were identified four evaluate system related sixteen pre-selected rules. Three major groups, namely, resource managers, users interest groups represented hypothetical An interviewerassisted questionnaire survey was used derive PMs terms preference functions weights as required by PROMETHEE/GAIA method computer software tool Decision Lab 2000. A total 97 personnel selected from Water Victoria University participated expressing their eight PMs. Finally, an overall ranking obtained together with other output results, focused best compromises between considered. yields reliable robust results varying compositions considered study. innovation project development transparent intuitive that has be developed

参考文章(116)
D. Ríos Insua, E. Gallego, A. Mateos, S. Ríos‐Insua, MOIRA: A decision support system for decision making on aquatic ecosystems contaminated by radioactive fallout Annals of Operations Research. ,vol. 95, pp. 341- 364 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1018910326129
Eric Jacquet-Lagrèze, Interactive Assessment of Preferences Using Holistic Judgments the Prefcalc System Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 335- 350 ,(1990) , 10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_15
J.-P. Ancot, J. H. P. Paelinck, Recent Experiences with the Qualiflex Multicriteria Method Qualitative and Quantitative Mathematical Economics. pp. 217- 266 ,(1982) , 10.1007/978-94-009-7526-2_8
Carlos A Bana e Costa, Jean-Claude Vansnick, None, The MACBETH Approach: Basic Ideas, Software, and an Application Springer Netherlands. pp. 131- 157 ,(1999) , 10.1007/978-94-017-0647-6_9
S. H. Rogers, T. P. Seager, K. H. Gardner, Combining Expert Judgement and Stakeholder Values with Promethee: A case Study in Contaminated Sediments Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences. pp. 305- 322 ,(2004) , 10.1007/1-4020-2243-3_20
P C Fishburn, LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES: A SURVEY JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE. ,vol. 20, pp. 1442- 1471 ,(1974)
Milton C. Weinstein, Clinical Decision Analysis ,(1980)
K. Srinivasa Raju, Lucien Duckstein, Cecile Arondel, MULTICRITERION ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES PLANNING: A CASE STUDY IN SPAIN Water Resources Management. ,vol. 14, pp. 435- 456 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1011120513259