The Good in the Pill. Assessing the Plausibility of Visions of Desirable Worlds

作者: Federica Lucivero

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23282-9_5

关键词:

摘要: Building on the analyses provided in Chaps. 3 and 4, this chapter establishes that general claims regarding desirability of an emerging technology appear to often draw a superficial unifying rhetoric supposedly shared values. The discourses Nanopil implicitly or explicitly refer number values – autonomy, care, comfort, efficiency is claimed promote. analysis demonstrates ambivalence contradictions inherent expectation “offers solution for social problem”, “addresses need” “improves our current practice”. It does so by building frameworks developed field philosophy within “Vision Assessment” approach. Such bring forward moral connotation possible design choices latent ethical controversies stakeholders’ normative positions, as well potential technology-mediated changes landscape value framework.

参考文章(18)
Annemaire Mol, What diagnostic devices do: the case of blood sugar measurement. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. ,vol. 21, pp. 9- 22 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1009999119586
Tsjalling Swierstra, Rinie van Est, Marianne Boenink, Taking care of the symbolic order. How converging technologies challenge our concepts Nanoethics. ,vol. 3, pp. 269- 280 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S11569-009-0080-0
Bruno Latour, Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society Published in <b>1987</b> in Cambridge Mass) by Harvard university press. ,(1987)
Alfred Nordmann, Knots and strands: an argument for productive disillusionment. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. ,vol. 32, pp. 217- 236 ,(2007) , 10.1080/03605310701396976