Her2/neu Status Determination in Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience Using a Dual-Testing Approach With Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.

作者: James P. Solomon , Marie Dell’Aquila , Oluwole Fadare , Farnaz Hasteh

DOI: 10.1093/AJCP/AQW224

关键词:

摘要: Objectives According to current guidelines, either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH) can be used determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2/neu) status breast carcinoma. While the guidelines explicitly delineate result interpretation, there is no consensus on most appropriate testing algorithm. Methods The Her2/neu statuses of 369 consecutive cases invasive cancer (from 351 patients) were assessed a dual-testing algorithm that uses both IHC and fluorescence ISH (FISH). FISH was performed using dual-color HER2/ chromosome enumeration probe 17 ( CEP17 ) probes, if equivocal results obtained, reflex HER2/lissencephaly gene 1 LIS1 probes used. Results from modalities scored reported American Society Clinical Oncology/College Pathologists 2013 criteria. Sixty-one (16.5%) tumors found positive by at least one modality. overall concordance between 97.6%. Six reclassified as after negative result. also able identify significantly more Her2/neu-positive than IHC. Conclusions commonly strategy based may deny potentially beneficial targeted therapy for small cohort patients, which should considered are formulated cost-benefit analyses various algorithms assessed.

参考文章(20)
Thomas H. Long, Helen Lawce, Connie Durum, Stephen R. Moore, Susan B. Olson, Ken Gatter, Megan L. Troxell, The New Equivocal: Changes to HER2 FISH Results When Applying the 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 144, pp. 253- 262 ,(2015) , 10.1309/AJCP3Q9WFOQTKUVV
Kristen E. Muller, Jonathan D. Marotti, Vincent A. Memoli, Wendy A. Wells, Laura J. Tafe, Impact of the 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 Guideline Updates at an Academic Medical Center That Performs Primary HER2 FISH Testing: Increase in Equivocal Results and Utility of Reflex Immunohistochemistry. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 144, pp. 247- 252 ,(2015) , 10.1309/AJCPE5NCHWPSMR5D
Marie-Pierre Chenard, Marie-Pierre Wissler, Noëlle Weingertner, Carole Mathelin, Jean-Pierre Bellocq, HER2 gene and protein expression status of breast carcinoma can be reliably tested on a single slide Virchows Archiv. ,vol. 467, pp. 169- 175 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S00428-015-1781-0
Louis P. Garrison, Joseph B. Babigumira, Anthony Masaquel, Bruce C.M. Wang, Deepa Lalla, Melissa Brammer, The Lifetime Economic Burden of Inaccurate HER2 Testing: Estimating the Costs of False-Positive and False-Negative HER2 Test Results in US Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer Value in Health. ,vol. 18, pp. 541- 546 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JVAL.2015.01.012
Momin T Siddiqui, Cynthia Cohen, Mary Diane Kinsella, Aziza Nassar, Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression pre- and post- neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast carcinoma: a single institutional experience. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology. ,vol. 5, pp. 530- 536 ,(2012)
Daniela Furrer, François Sanschagrin, Simon Jacob, Caroline Diorio, Advantages and disadvantages of technologies for HER2 testing in breast cancer specimens. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 144, pp. 686- 703 ,(2015) , 10.1309/AJCPT41TCBUEVDQC
Massimo Barberis, Caterina Pellegrini, Maria Cannone, Carmelo Arizzi, Guido Coggi, Silvano Bosari, Quantitative PCR and HER2 testing in breast cancer: a technical and cost-effectiveness analysis. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. ,vol. 129, pp. 563- 570 ,(2008) , 10.1309/1AKQDQ057PQT9AKX
S. van de Ven, V.T.H.B.M. Smit, T.J.A. Dekker, J.W.R. Nortier, J.R. Kroep, Discordances in ER, PR and HER2 receptors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews. ,vol. 37, pp. 422- 430 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.CTRV.2010.11.006