Soil solution electrical conductivity measurements using different dielectric techniques

作者: Yasser Hamed , Magnus Persson , Ronny Berndtsson

DOI: 10.2136/SSSAJ2003.1071

关键词:

摘要: Accurate measurements of soil solution electrical conductivity (or.) are needed in various applications. One recently developed technique that measures sigma(w) is the Sigma Probe (SP). The SP supposed to give accurate readings only-slightly dependent on water content (theta) and type. To test performance SP, it was compared with another dielectric technique, time domain reflectometry (TDR). Both techniques utilize constant (K-a) bulk (sigma(a)) estimate sigma(w). Measurements were obtained a laboratory experiment using nine different types theta range 0.05 0.50 m(3) m(-3). In each type, three used (approximately 0.3, 1.2, 3.0 dS m(-1)). linear sigma(w)-sigma(a)-theta model by contains only one specific parameter (K-0) Using this model, over encountered 0, whereas TDR estimation calculated same typically increased at K-a values below 10 15. default K-0 value 4.1 gave 20% true when > 1 m(-1). error for or, lower than m(-1) can be much larger except sandy soils. conventional more all theta, root mean square errors about 50% readings. However, requires parameters have during calibration experiment. (Less)

参考文章(21)
E V Maas, Salt tolerance of plants Applied agricultural research (USA). ,vol. 1, pp. 12- 25 ,(1986)
M. A. Hilhorst, A pore water conductivity sensor Soil Science Society of America Journal. ,vol. 64, pp. 1922- 1925 ,(2000) , 10.2136/SSSAJ2000.6461922X
M. A. Malicki, R. T. Walczak, Evaluating soil salinity status from bulk electrical conductivity and permittivity European Journal of Soil Science. ,vol. 50, pp. 505- 514 ,(1999) , 10.1046/J.1365-2389.1999.00245.X
E.V. Maas, G.J. Hoffman, CROP SALT TOLERANCE–CURRENT ASSESSMENT Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division. ,vol. 103, pp. 115- 134 ,(1977) , 10.1061/JRCEA4.0001137
G. Amente, John M. Baker, Clive F. Reece, Estimation of Soil Solution Electrical Conductivity from Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity in Sandy Soils Soil Science Society of America Journal. ,vol. 64, pp. 1931- 1939 ,(2000) , 10.2136/SSSAJ2000.6461931X
J. D. Rhoades, P. A. C. Raats, R. J. Prather, Effects of Liquid-phase Electrical Conductivity, Water Content, and Surface Conductivity on Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity Soil Science Society of America Journal. ,vol. 40, pp. 651- 655 ,(1976) , 10.2136/SSSAJ1976.03615995004000050017X
G. C. Topp, J. L. Davis, A. P. Annan, Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines Water Resources Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 574- 582 ,(1980) , 10.1029/WR016I003P00574
Z. J. Sun, G. D. Young, R. A. McFarlane, B.M. Chambers, The effect of soil electrical conductivity on moisture determination using time-domain reflectometry in sandy soil Canadian Journal of Soil Science. ,vol. 80, pp. 13- 22 ,(2000) , 10.4141/S98-089