Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS)

摘要: Patient-reported measures of knee function are important for the comprehensive assessment rheumatology conditions in both clinical and research contexts. To merit inclusion this review, were required to be patient reported assess aspects considered by adult patients with problems such as injury or osteoarthritis (OA). Therefore, used rheumatology, orthopedics, sports medicine considered. Dimensions deemed included pain, function, quality life, activity level. identify instruments fulfilling these criteria, we utilized published reviews (1), OA (2), use patellofemoral arthroplasty (3). Based on reviews, well extensive searches more recent literature, following 9 patient-reported outcomes: Activity Rating Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Evaluation Form, Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Score Physical Function Short Survey Activities Daily Living Lysholm Scoring Tegner Oxford Western Ontario McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC). Although WOMAC can applied hip knee, study contains data only applicable knee. Measures assessing level listed separately. Psychometric pertaining reliability responsiveness each outcome shown Tables 1 ​and2.2. The number psychometric reports concerning instrument ranges from 2–27. A higher indicates a degree certainty interpretation properties. Table 1 Summary data* Table 2 Summary data* Psychometric properties based provided 2, interpreted using standardized guidelines. Internal consistency was adequate if Cronbach’s alpha at least 0.7 (4), test–retest (intra-rater) intraclass correlation coefficient 0.8 groups 0.9 individuals (5). Floor ceiling effects absent no participants scored bottom top score, respectively, acceptable large (9). In context, minimum clinically difference is amount change that represents meaningful patient, while patient-acceptable symptom state abnormal score which would consider themselves having (10).