Risk Costs and the Choice of Market Return Index

作者: Allen M. Featherstone , Koffi N. Amegbeto

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: Six measures of returns are used to estimate the most "appropriate" market index for southeast Kansas farms. Results suggest that localized indices more appropriate than state use as index. The was systematic and nonsystematic risk costs farm planning. Estimated risks depend on choice index, whereas aversion level. Rankings enterprises change when considered. More risk-averse specialized farmers not completely compensated risk. Farm income variability is a problem businesses deal with each year. diversification one method can be reduce However, it difficult understand plan because various sources often do riskreturn tradeoffs based upon correlations, means, standard deviations, risk-aversion coefficients. Meanvariance techniques derive efficient strategies usually consider an individual enterprise's contribution farm. In order farmer make decisions wisely, improved information about associated necessary. Including cost in enterprise budgets will allow begin see some risk-return occur comparing alternative enterprises. Considering may preferred ordering objective this study determine levels corresponding selection using from actual data. addition, article considers whether results differ definitions portfolio. Nonsystematic reduced diversifies, while not. If fully diversified, zero. A estimated subtracted budgeted returns. By estimating different enterprises, managers portfolios. single model (SIM) has been finance agriculture simplify needs mathematical programming models (Sharpe; Collins Barry; Turvey, Driver, Baker). It provides estimates represent variance-covariance structure Several studies have SIM either provide optimal combinations or (Collins Turvey Driver; Baker; Gempesaw et al.; Sharpe considered ex post literature (Frankfurter). Frankfurter found basis, performed well others. argued better efforts should made applications extension Barry deflated averages form Baker chose nominal al. detrended real Indiana net rate return assets possible indices. Thus, their

参考文章(13)
Phelim Boyle, Sharpe, William F. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance. ,(2010) , 10.1002/9780470061602.EQF01007
C. M. Gempesaw, A. M. Tambe, R. M. Nayga, U. C. Toensmeyer, THE SINGLE INDEX MARKET MODEL IN AGRICULTURE Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. ,vol. 17, pp. 147- 155 ,(1988) , 10.1017/S0899367X00001781
Lars Brink, Bruce McCarl, The Tradeoff between Expected Return and Risk Among Cornbelt Farmers American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 60, pp. 259- 263 ,(1978) , 10.2307/1240057
Robert A. Collins, Peter J. Barry, Risk Analysis with Single-Index Portfolio Models: An Application to Farm Planning American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 68, pp. 152- 161 ,(1986) , 10.2307/1241660
Walter N. Thurman, The Poultry Market: Demand Stability and Industry Structure American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 69, pp. 30- 37 ,(1987) , 10.2307/1241303
Walter N. Thurman, Endogeneity Testing in a Supply and Demand Framework The Review of Economics and Statistics. ,vol. 68, pp. 638- 646 ,(1986) , 10.2307/1924523
T. S. Breusch, A. R. Pagan, The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics The Review of Economic Studies. ,vol. 47, pp. 239- 253 ,(1980) , 10.2307/2297111
William F. Sharpe, A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis Management Science. ,vol. 9, pp. 277- 293 ,(1963) , 10.1287/MNSC.9.2.277
Calum G. Turvey, H. C. Driver, Timothy G. Baker, Systematic and Nonsystematic Risk in Farm Portfolio Selection American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 70, pp. 831- 836 ,(1988) , 10.2307/1241924