Aspects of the X-efficiency theory of the firm

作者: Harvey Leibenstein

DOI: 10.2307/3003244

关键词:

摘要: The model explains the phenomenon of X-efficiency, and presents some microeconomic propositions based on new foundations that go beyond economic man postulate. It postulates behavior a compromise between internal standards unconstrained desires. analysis emphasizes: (1) individual, not firm, as basic decision unit; (2) notion effort variable; (3) determination costs result interconnected individual decisions, by simultaneous price, technique, quantity decisions "supermanager." Firm members are presumed to have discretion hence interpret their jobs. Inert behavioral areas, entropy, motivational interpretation signals elements model. One is firms do minimize costs, this may hold even under competition.

参考文章(17)
Oliver Williamson, Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations The American Economic Review. ,vol. 63, pp. 316- 325 ,(2016)
Hurvey Leibenstein, Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency The American Economic Review. ,vol. 56, pp. 392- 416 ,(1966)
Sidney G Winter, Richard R Nelson, Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Economic Capabilities The American Economic Review. ,vol. 63, pp. 440- 449 ,(1973)
Amartya K. Sen, Isolation, Assurance and the Social Rate of Discount Quarterly Journal of Economics. ,vol. 81, pp. 112- 124 ,(1967) , 10.2307/1879675
Stephen A. Marglin, The Social Rate of Discount and The Optimal Rate of Investment Quarterly Journal of Economics. ,vol. 77, pp. 95- 111 ,(1963) , 10.2307/1879374
Harvey Leibenstein, Competition and X-Efficiency: Reply Journal of Political Economy. ,vol. 81, pp. 765- 777 ,(1973) , 10.1086/260073
T. Y. Shen, TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION, SUBSTITUTION, AND X-EFFICIENCY Econometrica. ,vol. 41, pp. 263- 284 ,(1973) , 10.2307/1913489
K.J. Cohen, Theory of the firm : resource allocation in a market economy Prentice-Hall International Series in Management (EUA). ,(1965)
Harvey Leibenstein, Organizational or Frictional Equilibria, X-Efficiency, and the Rate of Innovation Quarterly Journal of Economics. ,vol. 83, pp. 600- 623 ,(1969) , 10.2307/1885452