作者: Kenneth L. Kraemer , Vallabh Sambamurthy , Kalle Lyytinen , Michel Avital , Steve Sawyer
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: So far, the discourse around nature of IS discipline has focused on centrality theory in defining and legitimating field. In contrast, we re -position this debate focus data. Specifically, panel discuss how sy stematic approaches to data sharing practices, improved collection instrumentation as well increased access (and use s of) large institutionally managed corpora can play a critical role evolution shaping scholarly fi eld study. Subsequently, explore current position status research , ask : does it affect prevailing practices legitimacy field? And how, if at all, should address situation? We submit tha t whole been poor field with inadequate preservation reuse relatively less advanced instrumentation. Overall, argue that producing, maintaining using dat assets fields result economic deficiency, ineffectiveness, missed opportunities. Furthermore, aim highlight some emerging enrichment opportunities encourage more researchers think abo ut programs . The community’s lack attention towards developing scale cumulative IT -related subject matters begs question: afford staying poo r