Connected citizens or digital isolation? : online disability activism in times of crisis

作者: Filippo Trevisan

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: This thesis asks whether the internet can at all re-configure political participation into a more inclusive experience for disabled users, enhancing their stakes in citizenship. issue assumes particular relevance time which, amidst worst economic crisis decades, rights of those traditionally excluded from civic life are risk being compromised even further. In an effort to transcend restrictive access/accessibility framework applied so far disability and new media research, this project focused on “digitalisation” activism wake radical welfare reform introduced by UK government between 2010 2012. A combination emerging digital methods established social science techniques were employed map analyse groups involved opposing proposed changes online. These included: hyperlink network analysis; “inventory” online media; content analysis Facebook conversations; semi-structured interviews with key figures variety campaigning groups. Overall, work exposed evolution ecology British involving both way which existing organisations operate as well emergence new, online-based players. particular, three main group types identified. formal (both “professionalised” charities member-led groups); experienced activists who experimented e-campaigning first time; young bloggers-turned-activists operated exclusively rapidly gained visibility traditional mass (i.e. print broadcast). Each these phenomena was explored detail through emblematic case studies (The Hardest Hit; Disabled People Against Cuts; The Broken Britain). Several findings emerged that invited reflections changing nature age significance resource disadvantaged broadly. To assess influence contextual factors trends, compared American counterparts, same period proposals drastic cuts federal Medicaid funding. In Britain, players found be blending repertoires participatory tools bid “survive” pressure user-expectations fast pace contemporary politics. Meanwhile, generation self-appointed “leaders” used construct radically different form activism. issues than ideology, aspiring redesigning protest less contentious arguably effective fashion. Nevertheless, high centralisation rigid leadership style adopted very campaigners also cast doubts ability promote supporters, whose involvement ultimately constituted “peer-mediated” citizenship rather direct empowerment. At time, comparative part study captured counter-intuitive picture ahead counterparts terms innovation. generated some important “context” politics reference relationship systemic circumstantial factors, importance acute moments triggers progress e-activism.

参考文章(184)
Thomas C. Leonard, Michael Schudson, The good citizen : a history of American civic life The Journal of American History. ,vol. 86, pp. 1322- 1323 ,(1999) , 10.2307/2568629
Joanne M. Kuzma, Accessibility Design Issues with UK E-government Sites Government Information Quarterly. ,vol. 27, pp. 141- 146 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.GIQ.2009.10.004
Caroline Haythornthwaite, Social networks and Internet connectivity effects Information, Communication & Society. ,vol. 8, pp. 125- 147 ,(2005) , 10.1080/13691180500146185
Stephen Coleman, Giles Moss, Under Construction: The Field of Online Deliberation Research Journal of Information Technology & Politics. ,vol. 9, pp. 1- 15 ,(2012) , 10.1080/19331681.2011.635957
Marian Barnes, Janet Newman, Andrew Knops, Helen Sullivan, Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation Public Administration. ,vol. 81, pp. 379- 399 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1467-9299.00352
RUSSELL SPEARS, MARTIN LEA, Panacea or Panopticon? The Hidden Power in Computer-Mediated Communication Communication Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 427- 459 ,(1994) , 10.1177/009365094021004001
Mike Oliver, Changing the Social Relations of Research Production Disability, Handicap & Society. ,vol. 7, pp. 101- 114 ,(1992) , 10.1080/02674649266780141
Len Barton, The struggle for citizenship: the case of disabled people Disability, Handicap & Society. ,vol. 8, pp. 235- 248 ,(1993) , 10.1080/02674649366780251
Tom Shakespeare, Cultural Representation of Disabled People: Dustbins for Disavowal? Disability & Society. ,vol. 9, pp. 283- 299 ,(1994) , 10.1080/09687599466780341